Everyone on the internet is angry. I guess that's nothing new, but are things worse than usual?

Over the past week, the X (Twitter) algorithm has been serving me more negativity than usual. When your feeds are algorithmic, you have to stay cognizant of the fact that the platform has basically engineered what you see. Platforms like X, Instagram, etc. have billions of posts covering thousands upon thousands of topics. What you engage with is ultimately what you end up seeing. For me, that's obviously gaming and Microsoft-adjacent topics.

DEAL: Get Surfshark VPN 86% OFF with Windows Central 🦈

For whatever reason, X has been boosting visibility for negativity on a variety of upcoming and recently released games. Wolverine for PS5 for example, is currently the subject of memes and mockery. GTA 6 also has a pretty broad hate campaign going on, and Halo Campaign Evolved too has been picked apart and torn to shreds as well.

Are things worse than usual? Is this par for the course? Have you noticed an upswing in negative discourse? Or is it all symptomatic of something else ...?

How much is grift, how much is genuine?

At least with regards to X, since the platform began paying people for their tweets, it seems to have amplified and incentivized some negative behaviors. Humans seem hard wired to engage with negativity in general, and there's likely evolutionary reasons for it if you dig deep enough — avoiding and mitigating negative outcomes is a survival trait oft-exploited by social media platforms to boost engagement. Everyone knows it. Articles with negative headlines simply get more clicks, with Google etc. use as a positive signal. It's why you'll more often see negative headlines even if the outlet or author in question tries to keep things balanced — positive content simply doesn't surface as often.

I do my absolute best to stay out of it and keep things balanced, but the algorithm doesn't really help my visibility therein. I get as many hate comments saying I'm an Xbox shill as I do saying I'm an Xbox hater, because it's ultimately the algorithm that decides which aspects of my content you see.

It could be a simple case of algorithmic perception here on my end, but I also see an uptick in people commenting on said negativity and nitpicking. Whether it's recent games like Wolverine or hate campaigns against recent movies like Nolan's The Odyssey, needless politicization and polarization seems to be social media strategy du jour right now.

There should always be room for genuine, constructive criticism of course. I'd argue that even less-constructive criticism is valid in a free speech context as long as you know you'll get push back for anything that is either outright dumb or at the very least, ill-conceived.

Where it becomes exhausting is when it's either obviously in bad faith or steeped in some kind of agenda. I think in the case of Wolverine for PS5 for example, it's getting a lot of collateral negativity right now owing to PlayStation's decision to kill physical discs — a plan that has large swaths of the internet up in arms. It reminds me of negative blowback some Xbox One games got back in the day unfairly too in my view, like RYSE, Killer Instinct, and even Titanfall, as Xbox's DRM plan was met with similar consternation fairly or not.

People seem to be mocking Wolverine based on a slice of gameplay that showcases some cinematic gameplay, with users suggesting it seems too "on rails" or something. I'm curious if those users have ever played a cinematic action game before ... because these sequences are hardly representative of the full package. Maybe I'm wrong, but it just seems like hate for the sake of hate, rather than genuine feedback.

Grand Theft Auto 6 also has a huge amount of hate flowing towards it right now, partially for Netflix's "exclusive" trailer, partially for its pay-walling of features behind expensive deluxe editions. People seem to be actively hoping for some of these games to fail, and it all seems to share a common thread.

Sometimes it seems to be less about the gameplay really. People seem to be less tolerant and more aware of corporate greed than I've known in previous years covering this industry, and maybe they're using other avenues to express it — regardless of the collateral.

It feels beyond gaming too

The problem is that the anger is feeding grifters who are less concerned with actual corporate shenanigans, and more interested in riding negativity to highlight a political agenda. Many of these people evidently don't even game with any regularity, and have just seen an opportunity to farm engagement.

Furthermore, I'd argue the grift, political or not, buries legitimate feedback at times. I'm not sure humans were designed to be subjected to 24/7 drip feeds of negativity, least of all individual game developers and creators who aren't responsible for the decisions of their higher ups. I have written some pretty scathing critiques of World of Warcraft's writing in recent months, but I'd hope that they're at least constructive and presented in good faith.

Perhaps people are just generally angry right now too. Wealth inequality has become absurd. Global economies revolve around benefitting the few over the many, with opportunities limited and honest work no longer providing a decent quality of life.

Perhaps gaming is a convenient outlet for expressing anger that isn't necessarily stemming from gaming directly. Gaming companies are visible online and individuals who work there often interact with the public, unlike other types of industries.

It perplexes me somewhat, because I feel as though I've got more high-quality games to play than I've ever had access to in my life. Mortal Shell II just came out and it's awesome, Star Wars Zero Company is on the horizon and that seems awesome too. Gears of War: E-Day plays fantastically well too. Onimusha is almost here, that seems excellent as well from what I've played. Blood of the Dawn Walker looks interesting. There are dozens of indie games I haven't gotten around to yet that I want to play as well.

There's plenty of games that have disappointed me ... but I tend to just move on from those, rather than make hating them my entire personality. They're just video games, right? Something else will come along, something better.

DEAL: Get Surfshark VPN 86% OFF with Windows Central 🦈

But I could also be wrong, sure. Maybe I'm naïve and overly optimistic, or am more tolerant of the issues. The gaming industry is facing unprecedented disruption, producing more layoffs than I've ever known since doing this. Traditional gaming audiences are being devoured by non-gaming activities and spend, and users are spending more time in free-to-play games without actually spending any money. Ownership rights are under threat by digitization. It's unclear if our hobby will even be affordable in the future thanks to Team Altman hogging all the RAM.

It's an odd thing: there's more games worth playing than ever, but more reasons to be genuinely concerned about the direction of the industry as well.

What's your take? Is it all just a social media bubble? Are games actually worse than ever? Are people aging out and don't want to accept it? I want to hear your thoughts.

Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.

Console war. Console war never changes. Or well, maybe a little bit.

You all know the story. Xbox ran away from exclusives a couple of years ago to boost margins, but all it ended up doing was hollowing out their own platform, with first and third-party sales declines while giving away its market share to competitors without so much as a fight.

It started with Sea of Thieves, and ended with Halo itself going to PlayStation, robbing Xbox of, potentially, a reason to exist at all. "If PlayStation has its own exclusives and Xbox's exclusives, why ever buy an Xbox?" Some might ask.

Fast forward to 2026, and things are changing. Incoming Xbox CEO Asha Sharma is intent on giving Xbox exclusives again, starting with Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution next year.

DEAL: Get Surfshark VPN 86% OFF with Windows Central 🦈

But, at the same time, you can't help but wonder "why" on paper.

This week, Xbox CEO Asha Sharma teased The Elder Scrolls 6, which seems to be subtitled "Sentinel."

Following the tease, debate began spreading across social media about whether or not Microsoft should truly go all in and bring the big guns: for Xbox Helix, would it move the needle if Elder Scrolls 6 or Fallout 5 were console exclusive, or would Xbox simply be cutting its nose off to spite its face?

The argument against Xbox console exclusivity

It feels like the era of hardware subsidization is pretty much over. As the bulk of playtime hours go to games like Fortnite, which have very fickle monetization per user, platform holders are increasingly looking to the point of purchase itself to make money. Sony itself said it will no longer sell PlayStation hardware at a loss, and it seems Xbox is following suit.

In that world, it potentially makes far more sense to meet players where they are. With console hardware more expensive than ever, players are less likely than ever to switch platform or buy multiple consoles potentially.

It's pretty simple, really. By skipping PS5 or Nintendo Switch 2 and taking Elder Scrolls 6 Xbox console exclusive, you're potentially going to be harming the very expensive game's margins and profitability, at least on paper. It's not as if PlayStation's audience would deliver a 100% attach rate for Elder Scrolls 6 or Fallout 5, but there are many millions of potential customers who would potentially simply skip the game were it not available on their platform of choice.

Is turning The Elder Scrolls 6 and things like Fallout 5 into a "loss leader" something 2026 Xbox and Microsoft is willing to do?

The argument for Xbox console exclusivity

Microsoft and others don't really really release data on how many users own both an Xbox Series X|S and a PS5, but some analysts suggest it could be up to 50%. Indeed, I've been told that a lot of the users Xbox sees across its network show up on different platforms, suggesting that even if Elder Scrolls 6 were exclusive, it would still have a pretty huge addressable audience to the tune of tens of millions even without PlayStation.

If Microsoft were to take Elder Scrolls 6 exclusive, it would send a very strong signal that Xbox is truly in it to win it (particularly if Elder Scrolls 6 is actually very good) and, the sales would come in strong regardless. If users can't buy it on PS5, they'd probably either grab it via Steam (which I can't see Xbox ditching any time soon) or their dusty Xbox Series X|S they haven't had any reason to turn on for several years.

By the time The Elder Scrolls 6 launches, Xbox will also have a range of new Cloud Gaming initiatives in the market place too. Direct-to-WiFi Xbox controllers will be available, shaving a non-trivial amount of latency off proceedings. Elder Scrolls 6 exclusivity might not just be a "loss leader" for Xbox Helix or Xbox Series X|S in that context, it could also be a marketing vehicle for "buy-to-own" Xbox Cloud Gaming, which I presume Xbox will be looking to market more seriously by the time the game launches.

If sales could become an issue under a console exclusivity package, Xbox could also take the step of keeping it off Xbox Game Pass Ultimate for a time, similar to what we're seeing with Call of Duty — although I imagine such a move would be pretty unpopular.

Poll: What do YOU think?

I can see both sides of the argument. Xbox Helix would have a massive boost in visibility with a tentpole exclusive like The Elder Scrolls 6 for its launch, but I'm not sure if The Elder Scrolls alone would be enough to convince users to drop a potential $1000 dollars on a video game console in this economy.

Xbox would need a steady cadence of high quality exclusives, and a visible strategy that says "if you buy this; you can expect more of these types of exclusives." The sorta "one offs" here and there with Gears of War: E-Day and Clockwork Revolution aren't going to cut it, I really feel like they need to be all-in and have all studios shoulder the burden of such a strategy, that would take years potentially to ferment.

The other argument is pretty simple: Xbox might end up just harming its studios' potential by limiting access arbitrarily. It's something CEO Satya Nadella touched on in court while explaining to lawmakers why Call of Duty would never go exclusive: the business model revolves around blanket market access.

DEAL: Get Surfshark VPN 86% OFF with Windows Central 🦈

The Elder Scrolls is arguably not like that, though ... nor are single player games in general. Xbox, PC, and Cloud Gaming should give Elder Scrolls the addressable audience to do gangbusters regardless. I heard Starfield was profitable before hitting PlayStation, for example, and so was Avowed. But is "profitable" enough for Microsoft shareholders, who are already likely annoyed by Xbox's drag on Microsoft's overall profit margin?

I think Xbox needs exclusive games to survive, and I think The Elder Scrolls 6 going exclusive would give the platform its best chance to make up lost ground over the previous two generations. I think a healthier Xbox is better for the industry, better for third-party developers, and better for Xbox customers in general. It's just unclear whether making The Elder Scrolls 6 exclusive actually would lead to a healthier Xbox ... since it would need to be part of a wider, and more visible strategy that I'm not sure Microsoft has the competitive spirit for in 2026.

At the end of the day: what would PlayStation or Nintendo do if they owned The Elder Scrolls 6 or Fallout 5? I think we all know the answer ...

But, what do YOU think? Vote in our poll above, let us know your thoughts in the comments.

Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.

Twitch has another backlash on its hands, this time for forcibly opting-in all of its users to wanton content theft.

Twitch is a generally awful platform. The business has been a major drag on Amazon's bottom line since they acquired the brand losing billions of dollars year in, year out. Amazon has simply been unable to figure out how to adequately monetize the platform in a video streaming universe dominated by YouTube and Google ads, but its treatment of its userbase and content creators has hardly helped.

DEAL: Get Surfshark VPN 86% OFF with Windows Central 🦈

Indeed, Twitch is facing another backlash right now for forcibly opting users into "ai training." Now, when you stream on Twitch, by default your likeness, content, voice, and other interactions will be used to train Amazon's AI stuff, in a move nobody could've seen coming.

they know we don't want it. they do not care.

— @witchytq.bsky.social (@witchytq.bsky.social.bsky.social) 2026-08-12T22:25:50.671Z

Responding to the backlash, Twitch Chief Product Officer Mike Minton admitted that they knew everyone hates it, but they don't care.

"Why is not opt-in?" Minton responded, acknowledging Twitch's very angry chat during a live stream this past week. "I get it ... let me opt-in vs. making me opt out. The honest answer, and I think most of you can probably appreciate this ... if it was opt-in, nobody would opt-in. That's honestly the answer. It's gonna' be on by default."

You can opt out of Twitch's AI content theft machine by going to settings, security and privacy, then toggling off "training for generative AI."

The entire tech world seems steeped in AI psychosis right now, expecting us plebians to just sit down and take generative slop and its painfully useless and forced "features" flooding into every corner of the web. AI Nutjob-In-Chief Sam Altman recently was fried alive on X (Twitter) for suggesting parents use ChatGPT to generate podcasts for their kids, rather than simply ... yanno, talk to them.

The latest Twitch backlash is just another long list in self-defeating stuff the platform has implemented over the last few years. For what it's worth, competitor YouTube does not give creators any control whatsoever over whether or not their content is used for training. Your content on YouTube is used automatically for Gemini's video training. Google only lets you opt-out of "third-party" training. At least Twitch is giving users an opt out ... which is something, I suppose.

As the tech world struggles to figure out how to make any of this AI stuff make sense, I suspect we'll see more dumb stuff emerge from the gaming universe, not less, in the near term.

Join us on Reddit at r/WindowsCentral to share your insights and discuss our latest news, reviews, and more.