Vue lecture

Il y a de nouveaux articles disponibles, cliquez pour rafraîchir la page.

Apple Turns 50, and Its Most Ambitious Phone Hasn’t Even Launched Yet — 5 iPhone Fold Concepts

On April 1st, 2026, Apple turns 50. For a company that has spent half a century rewriting the rules of consumer technology, the milestone deserves something genuinely transformative. The Macintosh redefined personal computing. The iPod gave an entire generation a new relationship with music. The original iPhone, unveiled in 2007, combined a phone, a music player, and the internet into a single glass rectangle and made every competitor look outdated overnight. The iPhone Fold is real, and it’s coming.

Leaks from early 2026 paint a detailed picture: a book-style foldable powered by the A20 Pro chip on a 2nm process, backed by a 5,500mAh battery, with a 7.8-inch creaseless OLED inner display and a 5.5-inch outer screen. Pricing is expected to start around $2,400, and while a September announcement seems likely, most analysts believe shipments may not begin until December. Designers, modders, and concept artists have spent years filling the void with their own visions of a folding iPhone, each carrying a distinct theory about what Apple should prioritize. These five concepts map the full range of that imagination and capture exactly how much is riding on the real thing.

1. iPhone iFold by Michal Dufka — The Clamshell That Makes Sense

Designer Michal Dufka’s iPhone iFold is built on restraint. Rather than reinventing the iPhone’s entire identity, it applies a clamshell fold to the form factor people already love, drawing direct inspiration from the MotoRAZR and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. The phone closes into a compact, pocketable square and opens into a full iPhone experience with a generously large display. For anyone who has quietly missed a phone that actually fits in a jeans pocket, this concept speaks to that feeling.

What sets the iFold apart is the secondary display placed beside the camera bump. When the phone is closed, that smaller screen surfaces notifications, time, and essential stats without requiring you to open the device at all. It functions almost like an Apple Watch built into the back of the phone. With Apple’s always-on display technology mature enough for this kind of ambient use, the dual-display setup feels less like speculation and more like a logical next step.

What We Like

  • The secondary display mirrors Apple Watch notification behavior, making glanceable information genuinely useful without ever opening the phone
  • The clamshell format makes the iPhone pocket-friendly for the first time in years without sacrificing screen size when it matters

What We Dislike

  • The clamshell form limits overall screen real estate compared to the expanded tablet surface that a book-style foldable provides
  • Hinge durability over sustained daily use is entirely unexplored here, and it remains the most critical engineering question for any clamshell design

2. iPhone Fold Ultra by 4RMD — When the Specs Match the Ambition

Design studio 4RMD’s iPhone Fold Ultra is grounded in credibility. Built directly from reported leaks rather than pure creative license, the concept presents a book-style foldable with dual 48MP rear cameras, a 24MP ultra-wide front camera, and the A20 Pro chip running on a 2nm process. Three color options appear across the renders: White, Black, and Deep Purple. At an estimated $2,299, this concept sits at the very top of Apple’s lineup with total conviction.

That Deep Purple colorway deserves its own moment. It is a deliberate callback to the iPhone 14 Pro’s most celebrated finish, and it lands differently on a book-style foldable. Something about that color on a device this ambitious reads as genuinely luxurious, the kind of finish that reframes a $2,299 price tag from a shock into a statement. 4RMD clearly understands Apple’s visual grammar, and this concept shows what happens when research and aesthetics share the same design space.

What We Like

  • Specs pulled from verified leaks give this concept real credibility, making it feel like a preview of what is actually coming rather than pure speculation
  • The Deep Purple colorway is a smart, crowd-pleasing callback to one of Apple’s most recognized and beloved finishes

What We Dislike

  • The “Ultra” label sets an expectation that demands exceptional build quality, and no concept can fully address whether the real device will deliver on that promise
  • Crease visibility across the inner display remains unaddressed, which continues to be the most persistent criticism of every book-style foldable on the market

3. iPhone Fold by Svyatoslav Alexandrov — The One That Replaces Two Devices

Svyatoslav Alexandrov’s iPhone Fold concept, created for the YouTube channel ConceptsiPhone, thinks in bigger terms than anything else on this list. Starting as a standard smartphone with a 6.3-inch outer display, it unfolds into a squarish 8-inch tablet that sits clearly in iPad Mini territory. This is not a phone with a bonus screen bolted on. It is a device designed to make carrying both an iPhone and an iPad feel genuinely redundant.

Alexandrov replaces Face ID with a full-display Touch ID fingerprint sensor, keeping the front notch minimal and clean. The rear carries the iPhone 12 Pro’s complete camera array: wide, ultra-wide, telephoto lenses, a LiDAR scanner, and flash. MagSafe compatibility and 5G readiness are already confirmed in the concept, adding meaningful weight to its productivity pitch. Whether the device supports the Apple Pencil is left open, but given an 8-inch inner display, its absence would feel like a missed opportunity.

What We Like

  • The full-display Touch ID is a clean and creative solution that keeps the front uncluttered while solving Face ID’s known complications on foldable form factors
  • The iPad Mini-sized inner screen makes a practical, real-world case for consolidating two devices into one without any meaningful compromise

What We Dislike

  • Removing Face ID eliminates one of the iPhone’s most seamless and trusted authentication features, which most users rely on dozens of times every day
  • Leaving Apple Pencil support unconfirmed weakens what should naturally be this concept’s strongest argument for productivity

4. iPhone Fold by Mechanical Pixel — The Foldable That Doesn’t Actually Fold

Mechanical Pixel’s concept takes the most unconventional approach on this list, and the reasoning is worth understanding. Rather than bending the iPhone itself, the design keeps the main body completely rigid and attaches a separate foldable display to the rear panel instead. The core phone experience remains exactly as people know it, maintaining the familiar dimensions and feel that iPhone users already rely on. That additional screen only enters the picture when a larger surface is specifically needed.

That rear foldable panel sits raised on a platform above the phone’s back, unfolding outward into a larger, squarish tablet surface when required. The layered profile is clearly visible from the side, giving the device a deliberately experimental and modular quality. The camera module remains in its standard position, completely unaffected by the additional display layer. The logic is unconventional, but the core argument of preserving the primary iPhone experience from any foldable compromise is genuinely hard to dismiss.

What We Like

  • Keeping the main body rigid entirely sidesteps the crease and long-term hinge durability problems that define every conventional foldable on the market today
  • The modular approach means the everyday iPhone experience is never degraded or compromised by the mechanics of the foldable element

What We Dislike

  • The raised rear platform creates an unrefined, layered side profile that sits well outside anything Apple’s design language has ever produced or endorsed
  • The prototype-like aesthetic makes it very difficult to imagine this direction surviving Apple’s notoriously demanding and detail-oriented product design process

5. iPhone V — The One Someone Actually Built

Every concept on this list exists as a digital render. The iPhone V is different. A YouTuber modder physically dismantled an iPhone X, extracted its internal components, and rebuilt the entire device inside a Motorola Razr chassis. The result is a working, folding iPhone that runs real iOS, carries a Retina-quality display, and folds in half like a classic flip phone. As a proof of concept, it is extraordinary. As a finished product, every question comes flooding in.

What makes the iPhone V genuinely compelling is not fit, finish, or polish, because it has none in any conventional sense. It is the straightforward fact that someone cared enough to prove the idea could actually work using parts that already exist. The folding mechanism and device thickness still need serious refinement. A working clamshell iPhone running authentic iOS is, in the end, a more persuasive argument for this form factor than any polished render has managed to be.

What We Like

  • The iPhone V is the only entry on this list that is fully functional, running real iOS inside an actual working clamshell device
  • Its physical existence proves the clamshell iPhone concept is viable using genuine Apple hardware, well beyond anything a render can demonstrate

What We Dislike

  • The repurposed Motorola Razr chassis produces a build that falls far short of consumer-grade fit, finish, and structural refinement
  • Hinge mechanism quality and overall device thickness remain significant engineering challenges that the mod cannot resolve, and they are exactly what Apple needs to solve

The Concepts That Made the Wait Worthwhile

Fifty years in, Apple is still the company that makes you wait. The iPhone Fold concepts here are not just exercises in creative imagination — they are a record of what designers and makers have been asking for, year after year. Some nailed the form factor. Others got the specs exactly right. A few did both. Together, they have shaped the entire conversation around a device that already feels utterly inevitable.

When the real iPhone Fold arrives, it will be measured against each of these visions. That is the power of concept design — it sets the bar before the product ships. Apple turning 50 while holding back its most ambitious device is pure theater. The design community has been writing this script for years. The only question is whether the real thing can live up to what the imagination has already built.

The post Apple Turns 50, and Its Most Ambitious Phone Hasn’t Even Launched Yet — 5 iPhone Fold Concepts first appeared on Yanko Design.

Leaked iPhone 18 Pro Screen Protector Shows A 35% Smaller Dynamic Island

Four years is a long time in smartphone design, long enough for entire product categories to rise, peak, and fade. Samsung has cycled through multiple foldable generations. Google has rebooted its Pixel lineup twice. Nothing has gone from startup curiosity to legitimate contender. Apple, meanwhile, has kept the Dynamic Island exactly where it was when it debuted with the iPhone 14 Pro, same width, same height, same visual footprint. Leaked screen protectors for the iPhone 18 Pro, sourced from Weibo, suggest that Apple has finally decided four years is long enough.

According to the leak, the infrared flood illuminator that powers Face ID is moving under the display on the iPhone 18 Pro, leaving only the infrared camera requiring a physical cutout alongside the front-facing lens. The result is a Dynamic Island roughly 35% smaller than what ships on the iPhone 17 Pro today. Apple is also expected to pair this with its first 2nm chip, the A20 Pro, along with a variable aperture system on the main camera. The 20th anniversary iPhone in 2027 is widely expected to go further with a fully clean display, but the 18 Pro represents the clearest signal yet that Apple is working its way there on a deliberate schedule.

Image Credits: Weibo

The size reduction is more significant than the percentage suggests when you look at the two side by side. The iPhone 17 Pro’s Island is a wide, commanding presence even at rest. The 18 Pro’s leaked cutout reads almost delicate by comparison, a narrow pill sitting unobtrusively at the top of the screen. Apple will still need to revisit four years of Live Activities design and the entire interaction vocabulary built around the existing Island’s dimensions, which is a reasonable explanation for why this transition is taking as long as it is.

Android manufacturers have shipped under-display cameras for years, with visible quality tradeoffs that Apple’s user base simply would not accept on a thousand-dollar phone. Holding the line until the technology meets the standard, rather than shipping it to win a spec sheet argument, is the kind of call that frustrates people in the short term and builds loyalty over time. The iPhone 18 Pro may read as a modest update on paper. That smaller pill tells a different story.

The post Leaked iPhone 18 Pro Screen Protector Shows A 35% Smaller Dynamic Island first appeared on Yanko Design.

Comment j'ai rendu mon serveur Plex surpuissant et silencieux grâce à un Mac Mini et des SSD Lexar

– Ccontient des liens affiliés Amazon –

Après des années de galère avec un NAS bruyant puis un miniPC pas beaucoup mieux, j'ai fini par trouver la configuration Plex idéale. Un Mac Mini M4 , deux SSD Lexar SL500 , et le silence absolu. Retour d'expérience.

Le bruit, l'ennemi numéro un

J'ai un serveur Plex depuis des années. Un serveur que je partage avec ma famille et mes amis les plus proches, et qui me sert à stocker des films et des séries souvent introuvables sur les plateformes légales, ou des versions numérisées de DVD et Blu-Ray que j'ai achetés, mais que je veux pouvoir streamer sur mon Apple TV. Vous voyez l'idée. Pendant longtemps, tout ça tournait sur un NAS Synology d'entrée de gamme. Ça marchait, mais dès que je voulais transcoder un film pour le regarder à distance, c'était mort. Lecture directe obligatoire, avec les problèmes de débit que ça implique, surtout à l'époque où j'étais encore en ADSL. Il y a trois ou quatre ans, j'ai décidé de monter d'un cran en déportant le serveur Plex sur un miniPC Beelink. Plus de puissance, transcodage enfin possible, bien pratique pour moi à distance ou pour mes proches qui n'ont pas forcément la fibre.

Sauf que toutes ces solutions avaient le même défaut. Le bruit. Entre les disques durs mécaniques, le ventilateur du NAS Synology qui ronronnait en permanence et celui du miniPC Beelink qui se mettait à souffler dès qu'on lui demandait un peu d'effort, c'était toujours pénible. Et comme je n'ai jamais eu la place de planquer tout ça dans un bureau ou un placard technique, le serveur a toujours tourné dans mon salon. Autant dire que les soirs de film, l'ambiance était moyennement au rendez-vous.

Le Mac Mini M4, une bête silencieuse

Et puis il y a quelques semaines, j'ai tout changé. Adios le miniPC, filé à un ami, et place au Mac Mini M4. Ce petit machin tout mignon, complètement silencieux, est une vraie bête de course pour Plex. On parle de quatre à cinq transcodages simultanés sans broncher, avec une sollicitation processeur qui reste sous les 3 à 4%. C'est presque absurde. Le tout en restant frais, sans ventilateur qui se déclenche, sans bruit parasite. Rien. Le silence total.

Pour l'administration, pas besoin d'écran ni de clavier. Tout se fait à distance via l'application Partage d'écran de macOS. Le Mac Mini est branché directement sur ma Livebox, et ça tourne comme une horloge. Et comme bonus, ça me fait un second Mac pour faire des tests quand j'en ai besoin. Pas mal pour une machine qui fait à peine la taille d'une main.

Les SSD Lexar SL500 en remplacement du NAS

Pour compléter le tableau, j'ai déplacé mes données les plus consultées, les films et les séries que ma famille et moi regardons le plus souvent, sur deux SSD SL500 de chez Lexar. Et là, c'est le coup de grâce pour le bruit. Non seulement les ventilateurs ont disparu avec le Mac Mini, mais les vibrations et le ronronnement des disques mécaniques du NAS aussi. Le silence est total. J'ai quand même gardé un NAS Synology en arrière-plan pour stocker les données froides, mon Time Machine et les films que personne ne regarde jamais. Il reste accessible à Plex au cas où, mais il est si peu sollicité qu'on l'entend à peine.

Le résultat, c'est une configuration compacte, silencieuse, et qui gère sans effort tout ce que je lui demande. Le Mac Mini fait tourner Plex comme si de rien n'était, les SSD Lexar offrent des temps d'accès instantanés, et le NAS se contente de dormir dans son coin.

Franchement, si vous êtes du genre à soigner votre setup multimédia à la maison, ce genre de configuration change la vie. Ça a un coût, on ne va pas se mentir, un Mac Mini M4 plus deux SSD externes ce n'est pas donné. Mais le confort au quotidien est incomparable. Plus de bruit, des performances de dingue pour le transcodage, et une machine qui ne chauffe même pas. Si vous avez la possibilité de basculer votre serveur Plex sur un Mac Mini, n'hésitez pas trop longtemps. Moi en tout cas, je ne reviendrais pas en arrière.

Si vous voulez vous équiper, voilà ma config :

MS-DOS tourne maintenant sur un Apple IIe, et c'est un projet open source

Un développeur a réussi à porter MS-DOS 2.0 sur l'Apple IIe, l'ordinateur personnel d'Apple sorti en 1983. Le projet, baptisé "reboot-camp-83", repose sur une carte d'extension qui embarque un processeur Intel 8088 à 8 MHz.

Le tout communique avec le processeur 6502 de l'Apple II, et le code est en accès libre. Quarante ans de retard, mais le geste est là, et il est plutôt classe.

Un processeur Intel dans un Apple II

Seth Kushniryk vient de publier "reboot-camp-83", un projet open source qui permet de faire tourner des applications MS-DOS 2.0 sur un Apple IIe. Pour que ça fonctionne, il faut une carte d'extension AD8088, fabriquée à l'époque par ALF Products.

Cette carte contient un processeur Intel 8088 qui tourne à 8 MHz et qui se branche sur le bus d'extension de l'Apple II. On se retrouve avec deux processeurs dans la même machine : le 6502 d'Apple et le 8088 d'Intel.

Kushniryk a développé un programme "pont" qui fait communiquer les deux processeurs. Il a aussi déplacé ce programme dans une zone différente de la RAM pour libérer de la place et permettre l'affichage en haute résolution.

Le tout a demandé pas mal de travail de débogage, avec entre autres un problème lié à une contrainte non documentée de ProDOS.

Ce que ça fait tourner, et ce que ça ne fait pas

Le port est compatible avec la quasi-totalité des logiciels MS-DOS 2.0, à une condition : que le programme n'écrive pas directement dans la mémoire vidéo. C'est une limitation qui exclut pas mal de jeux, mais les applications de productivité et les utilitaires fonctionnent.

Pour l'époque, avoir un processeur à 8 MHz dans un Apple IIe, c'était quand même une sacrée puissance de calcul, et pouvoir lancer des applications DOS en parallèle du système Apple aurait été un vrai avantage.

Le projet est entièrement open source et disponible sur le dépôt git de Kushniryk. Les mises à jour et la documentation sont publiées sur son site personnel.

Quarante ans de retard, mais c'est le geste qui compte

L'Apple IIe a été commercialisé en 1983, et MS-DOS 2.0 la même année. À l'époque, les cartes coprocesseur existaient déjà pour faire tourner CP/M-86 sur Apple II, mais le port complet de MS-DOS n'avait jamais été finalisé publiquement.

Kushniryk comble ce vide quarante ans plus tard, avec un projet qui relève plus de la prouesse technique et de la passion du rétro-computing que d'un usage pratique.

C'est le genre de projet qui ne sert à rien... et c'est pour ça qu'on l'aime bien. Faire tourner MS-DOS sur un Apple IIe, c'est un peu comme mettre un moteur de Porsche dans une 2CV : ça ne va pas révolutionner les transports, mais ça force le respect.

Le fait que le projet soit open source et bien documenté en fait aussi une ressource intéressante pour ceux qui s'intéressent au fonctionnement des processeurs de cette époque. Franchement, si en 1983 quelqu'un avait pu lancer Lotus 1-2-3 sur son Apple IIe, on en parlerait encore.

Source : Hackaday

Apple's cheap MacBook runs basic Windows 11 apps with great single-core performance — but Parallels struggles where it matters

The MacBook Neo runs single-core productivity apps in a Windows 11 virtual machine better than a more expensive Dell, but that's about all.

Apple MacBook Neo and Dell 14 laptops on a wooden desk

The MacBook Neo runs single-core productivity apps in a Windows 11 virtual machine better than a more expensive Dell, but that's about all.

❌