For a time, it seemed that foldable and rollable screens would be the future of laptops, just as they are positioned to be where smartphones are going. That was until people realized that what may be good for handheld devices might not work for 14-inch slabs with keyboards. Foldable laptops might still have their day, but they are too impractical and costly for now.

ASUS has chosen to instead design and deliver a solution for today’s needs and problems. Rather than a screen that folds just to save space, the Zenbook DUO has opted to expand the user’s workspace instead, bringing the productivity advantages of dual-monitor setups from desktops to laptops. This year’s ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) does more than just upgrade the spec sheet. It is also adding a touch of style and elegance that makes a power user tool feel more considered.

Designer: ASUS

Aesthetics

The 2026 ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) is quite stunning in almost any form, whether it’s closed shut, opened like a laptop, or especially when it’s wide open. The lid cover exudes not only minimalism but also character, with a reflective “ASUS ZENBOOK” logo engraved against the Elephant Gray “Ceraluminum” surface, creating a simple yet eye-catching visual and material contrast.

That Ceraluminum is, of course, ASUS’s latest material innovation that uses a special oxidation process to give aluminum some ceramic-like properties, particularly durability and higher resistance to scratches. The end result is a material that isn’t just nice to look at but also pleasing to touch, giving the lid a texture that almost feels like stone or, well, ceramic. There is also a certain visual “roughness” to the Ceraluminum surface, setting it apart from the brushed metal or anodized appearances of its peers.

Of course, the real show happens when you open the laptop and lift the keyboard away, revealing two gorgeous 14-inch screens connected together by a hinge, no messy or awkward cables. For this iteration, ASUS poured its efforts into making that connection look even more seamless, not only by shrinking the bezels between the displays but also by developing a new “hideaway” hinge that narrows the gap from 25.31mm down to 7.6mm. Make no mistake, there’s still a very obvious separation between the two, but it is now less jarring, making it feel like you’re working with a screen that just happened to be split into two, rather than two screens stitched together.

With the detachable Bluetooth keyboard resting on the second screen or when it’s closed, the Zenbook DUO (2026) looks almost like a normal laptop. You have a few (literally) ports on either side along with some air vents, and a wide-long grille at the bottom above the built-in kickstand. Your only clue that this isn’t a normal laptop is when you accidentally close the laptop lid without the keyboard attached, creating a very noticeable gap that, unfortunately, would also be an open invitation for small items to come in and scratch the screens.

Ergonomics

At 1.65kg (3.64lbs) with the Bluetooth keyboard attached, the ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) isn’t exactly lightweight compared to other 14-inch laptops in the market, at least the non-gaming kind. That said, it’s not exactly on the heavier side either, especially when you consider that you’re carrying two 14-inch screens, not to mention a 99Wh battery, in a single bundle. In that context, it’s actually amazing how much ASUS was able to reduce the heft without cutting corners.

That said, having two connected displays brings its own ergonomics puzzle, something that ASUS seems to have finally solved almost to perfection. You have no less than 5 ways to use the laptop, from a normal laptop to two screens vertically stacked to the side-by-side “desktop mode”. While the hinge does most of the hard work, the built-in kickstand literally carries the burden, supporting that full weight (minus the keyboard) on its own.

The new kickstand is stronger, sturdier, and stiffer, providing confidence it won’t just suddenly close down. It can open to a maximum of 90 degrees, which is the angle you’ll need for desktop mode. That said, it also means that you only have possible angle for the displays in that mode, unless you have a separate stand to prop it up, which kind of defeats the purpose of having a built-in kickstand.

One thing to note in desktop mode is that you will naturally be sacrificing one side of ports. Thankfully, you can turn the Zenbook DUO (2026) which ever side up, whether you need an extra HDMI and headphone jack, or an extra USB-A port. Thankfully, both Thunderbolt 4 ports are equal in capabilities, so you don’t have to make a sacrifice on that end.

If there’s one thing I found a bit cumbersome in the Zenbook DUO’s design is that the power button sits so flushed against the frame. On the one hand, that means it won’t snag with anything in your bag, nor will it get triggered accidentally. On the other hand, it also makes it harder to locate it without looking or fumbling with your finger sliding across the edge repeatedly.

Performance

The ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) is one of the early laptops to embrace Intel’s new Panther Lake chips, specifically the Intel Core Ultra 3 series. The dual-screen laptops comes in two options, one with an Intel Core Ultra 7 355 and the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H. In terms of CPU alone, these already represent a huge leap not just in performance but also in power efficiency, but the latter configuration pulls an even bigger feat.

The review unit we received comes with an Intel Arc B390 GPU based the latest 3rd-gen Intel Xe graphics. Forget what memories you might have had of integrated Intel graphics, because we’re entering an era where you can actually play games with decent settings on it. Of course, your mileage may vary and benchmarks can only provide some general idea, but that all these specs mean is that the ASUS Zenbook DUO (2026) is built for serious productivity and creative work.

It is, after all, designed for heavy-duty computer users ranging from knowledge workers to creators who need to bring the productivity they enjoy on the desktop to wherever they go. Productivity suites, video editors, graphics programs, 3D modelers, and even games won’t make this flexible laptop break a sweat. And yes, that includes some AI shenanigans, thanks to an upgraded NPU as well.

Of course, this also means that it has enough muscle to support running two screens which, by default, is set to extended (versus mirroring each other). The beauty is that these two screens are nearly identical not just in size but also in capabilities, where other dual-screen laptops skimp on the second screen more often than not. We’re talking two 14-inch 3K (2880×1800) 144Hz Lumina Pro OLED displays. Both support touch and, more importantly, both support the ASUS Pen stylus.

In reality, there are very slight differences between the two screens in terms of full color gamut and maximum brightness, but you won’t notice it too much unless you are actively looking for it. In practice, most people will keep content they’re working on in one of two screens anyway, leaving the other as an auxiliary for references or controls.

The latter is actually an interesting aspect of this dual-screen laptop, making the Zenbook DUO feel almost futuristic. While it does have a detachable keyboard, there might be times when you want to have more direct access to the lower touch screen without having to switch back and forth with the Bluetooth keyboard at the side. With a six-finger gesture, you can summon a half-height virtual keyboard, a half-height virtual keyboard with a virtual trackpad to the right, or a full-screen keyboard with a large trackpad below it, pretty much like the virtual equivalent of the physical keyboard.

Additionally, you can have other virtual knobs and sliders above the keyboard or as floating windows, thanks to ASUS’s Dial & Control app. These controls, which also include a numpad and an area for writing with a pen, can change depending on what app is currently in focus. With a browser window, it can have a button for a new tab or a dial for zooming in and out. Or it could be a knob for volume and a slider for screen brightness.

As for the detachable keyboard, it magnetically snaps into place, with retracting pogo pins creating a more stable connection than Bluetooth, though that is the only way to use it when it’s detached. That said, there are no notches or protrusions along the edges of the keyboard, so prying it away from that strong magnetic hold can take a bit of work. The keyboard charges when it’s lying on the laptop, but it can also be charged separately via USB-C. Key travel is decent, but the keys themselves feel a bit squishy. The large trackpad is sensitive, but the hydrophobic coating gives it too much resistance when gliding your finger across it.

The combination of the more power-smart Intel Panther Lake processor and the 99Wh battery tucked inside gives the ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) quite a long uptime, even with both screens enabled. Even a battery of benchmarks and hours of typing and browsing has left a good 12% of battery left, rounding up to a little over 15 hours of use, just a little below ASUS’s advertised 18 hours (with two screens). The included 100W USB-C charging brick helps mitigate the battery loss, and the fact that you can easily use power banks to top up on the go makes the battery narrative even more compelling.

Sustainability

ASUS didn’t use to speak much about the sustainability of its laptops, but that has changed in recent years. The invention of Ceraluminum adds another level to that story, though a bit indirectly. In a nutshell, the material is meant to increase the durability and longevity of the product by protecting it from small accidents. Whether the ZenBook DUO uses sustainable materials, or at least what percentage of it does, isn’t public information.

That longevity, however, is also affected by how much you can upgrade or even repair the laptop. Given how unconventional its design is, it’s really no surprise that there isn’t much here in the way of upgrade options. You do have easy access to the SSD underneath the kickstand. The Zenbook DUO (2026) can support up to 2TB with a full-sized M.2 SSD. The 32GB RAM, however, is soldered down.

Value

The ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407) is a laptop on a mission. It is, in a nutshell, designed for people who thrive and need multi-tasking capabilities that they could only enjoy while chained to their desk (or awkwardly carrying a portable monitor). That actually covers a wide range of professions and industries, including creators, designers, office workers, executives, and, yes, gamers. In that sense, there can probably be no better tool for them than this.

In both performance and flexibility, the 2026 Zenbook DUO offers users the power they need, as they need it. Cramped for space on a plane? Just use it as a single-screen laptop, and no one will be the wiser. Need to collaborate with a team? Lay it out flat on the desk to give everyone the same perspective. Need to reference documents as you write? The book-like desktop mode has you covered.

That said, it’s definitely far from perfect. For a laptop aimed at creatives and professionals, the absence of a built-in SD card reader seems pretty odd. And then there’s the $2,699.99 price for the configuration that has the impressive Intel Arc graphics. That puts it way above most 14-inch ultra-thin laptops and in the range of gaming laptops. But then again, none of those have two 14-inch screens, either.

Verdict

Laptops with foldable screens admittedly look fancy and impressive. The big OEMs, including ASUS, are still playing around to find the formula that will finally make it feel more than just a fancy and expensive experiment. In the meantime, however, people need to get work done, and when it comes to that, nothing really beats using more than two screens.

You could always carry a portable screen along with your laptop, which is awkward, cumbersome, and inefficient, or you could grab the ASUS Zenbook DUO (UX8407). With an improved hinge, beautiful co-equal 14-inch displays, and an Intel Panther Lake processor that can handle almost anything you throw at it, the dual-screen laptop lets you choose the way you want or need to work. And it looks stylish to boot in any form, making sure you’ll be the envy of everyone in the coffee shop.

The post ASUS Zenbook DUO (2026) Review: One Laptop, Two Screens, All Business first appeared on Yanko Design.

The Oppo Find N6 arrives at a moment when foldables can no longer rely on novelty alone to justify their place in the premium market. Buyers now expect these devices to feel as polished and dependable as any top-tier flagship, while still delivering the sense of occasion that only a folding design can offer. That is what makes the Find N6 so interesting, because it is not simply trying to look futuristic. It is trying to feel complete.

That question lands differently for me because the Oppo Find N5 has been my daily driver for most of the time since its launch. Living with that phone has given me a clear sense of what Oppo already does exceptionally well in this category, from hardware refinement to the balance between portability and immersion. It also means I came to the Find N6 with real expectations rather than fresh curiosity alone. More than anything, I wanted to see whether Oppo had merely polished an already strong formula or taken a meaningful step forward.

Designer: OPPO

Aesthetics

The Oppo Find N6 does not stray far from the design language established by the Find N5, but it feels like a more polished and disciplined evolution of that formula. The overall look is largely unchanged, yet the Find N6 comes across as more minimalistic and more refined, with a cleaner visual identity that feels calmer and more mature. Rather than chasing a dramatic redesign, Oppo has focused on tightening the details, and that gives the phone a stronger sense of cohesion.

The biggest improvement is in the rear camera treatment. The refined Cosmos Ring camera deco looks more elegant and less ornamental, while the individual camera elements feel more integrated into the overall composition instead of standing apart from it. This makes the back of the phone look tidier and more resolved, which suits the Find N6’s more minimal direction. It still has the visual presence expected of a flagship foldable, but it carries that presence with greater restraint.

What also stands out is Oppo’s color choice. For the first time on one of its foldables, the company is offering a much bolder orange finish, which Oppo calls Blossom Orange, alongside a more classic Stellar Titanium, and the timing does not feel accidental. Ever since the iPhone 17 Pro series introduced orange into the flagship conversation, it feels like other brands have been quick to follow Apple’s lead, and the Find N6 is part of that wave. Even so, the orange works well here, giving the phone more personality, while the gray remains the safer and more traditional option.

Ergonomics

The generous screen real estate of a foldable usually comes with familiar compromises. Thickness, weight, and the crease are often treated as the unavoidable price of admission. The Oppo Find N6, however, feels designed to challenge that assumption in a way that is noticeable the moment you pick it up.

At 8.3 mm when folded and 225 g, the Find N6 feels surprisingly close to a premium flagship bar phone in everyday use. It does not come across as awkwardly bulky or excessively heavy, which makes it more approachable than many devices in this category. That balance matters over time, whether you are using it one-handed, slipping it into a pocket, or simply carrying it through a long day.

That does not mean the form factor is free of trade-offs. If I rest some of the phone’s weight on my pinky, the lower edge can still dig in a bit, especially when the device is open. It is less noticeable than on the Find N5, but not completely gone.

Perhaps the most impressive detail, though, is the crease, or more precisely, how little of it remains. I have never been particularly bothered by creases on foldables, and I was already satisfied with the subtle crease on the Find N5. Even so, the Find N6 feels like a meaningful refinement rather than a minor iteration.

Visually, the crease is practically nonexistent in normal use and only becomes noticeable if the screen is off and viewed from a very specific angle. More impressive still, it also feels nearly absent under the finger when swiping across the display. Our fingertips are quick to pick up even slight ridges or shallow dents, which makes the Find N6’s smooth, uninterrupted surface especially impressive in daily use.

That sense of appreciation only grows once you look at how Oppo arrived at this result. The company refined the hinge architecture itself and paired it with state-of-the-art 3D scanning and 3D printing technologies, a combination that helps explain why the Find N6 feels so polished in the hand.

That same attention extends to the physical controls. In place of the OnePlus-style alert slider on the upper left, Oppo now uses the customizable Snap Key, first introduced on the Find X9 series and now positioned on the upper right side. It can be mapped to quick actions such as launching the camera, turning on the flashlight, starting a voice memo, or opening translation, giving it a broader role than the slider it replaces.

Just below sit the fingerprint reader and volume rocker, both placed lower than they were on the Find N5. That may sound like a minor adjustment, but it makes the controls easier to reach and better aligned with the way the phone naturally rests in the hand. It is a subtle refinement, though one that proves genuinely useful in everyday use.

Performance

With foldables, the screens have to justify the form factor. The Find N6 uses a 6.62-inch cover display and an 8.12-inch inner screen, both with 120Hz LTPO panels. That is the expected hardware at this level, so the more interesting part is how Oppo tries to improve the experience around visibility, comfort, and immersion.

According to Oppo, both displays can reach 1,800 nits in outdoor use, with peak HDR brightness topping out at 3,600 nits on the cover screen and 2,500 nits on the inner panel. In practice, both displays are bright enough to remain comfortably usable even under harsh sunlight. They also support Dolby Vision and HDR Vivid, and content looks rich and vibrant across both panels.

The Find N6 is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, and it has no trouble keeping up with the kind of multitasking a foldable encourages. Apps open quickly, navigation feels immediate, and even with several windows open at once, the phone stayed smooth and responsive. I also edited a short video on the device, specifically an unboxing of the Find N6 and AI Pen Kit, and the experience was smooth and free of noticeable stutter.

That matters because a device like this only really makes sense if it can handle more than the usual phone workload without feeling strained. Oppo’s software does a good job of making that extra screen space feel useful. Free-Flow Window lets you open up to four apps at once in floating windows, and in practice, it feels less fiddly than it sounds.

Boundless View adds even more flexibility, and the gestures linking the two work naturally enough that moving between layouts never feels like a chore. Resizing windows, shifting focus, and juggling multiple apps all feel smooth and seamless, which makes the Find N6 genuinely effective as a productivity device rather than just a phone with a bigger screen.

Even under sustained use, the phone remained smooth and reasonably controlled, and I also did not notice any stutter while playing Genshin Impact. Gaming feels more like a bonus here than the main point of the device, but the large inner display still gives it a more immersive, almost tablet-like feel than a standard phone can offer.

That same focus on utility extends to the AI Pen Kit, which is one of the more interesting hardware additions. The Oppo AI Pen supports 4,096 levels of pressure sensitivity and works on both the inner and outer displays, which makes the Find N6 more versatile for note-taking, annotation, and quick sketching. Because it connects over Bluetooth, the pen can also double as a remote shutter for both photos and video, which adds a genuinely useful layer of flexibility.

Oppo has also handled the practical side fairly well. The dedicated case gives the pen a proper place to live and keeps it charged through reverse wireless charging from the phone itself. That kind of integration is important because accessories like this are only useful if they are easy to carry and ready when you need them.

The software support around the pen is also fairly thoughtful. Quick Note lets you start writing quickly, a double press switches between writing and erasing, and global annotation makes it possible to mark up content across the interface and export it as an image or PDF afterward. There are also a few more specialized tools, including handwriting optimization, a handwriting calculator, and a Laser Pointer mode for presentations. Not all of these will be essential, but together they make the pen feel more genuinely useful than most stylus add-ons tend to.

Camera

The camera system performs well by foldable standards, but it is not on the level of the best camera-focused flagships. In practice, it feels closer to a solid upper mid-range setup, which is respectable enough for a device like this.

The rear camera system includes a 200MP main camera with a 21mm-equivalent focal length, a 1/1.56-inch ISOCELL HP5 sensor, an f/1.8 aperture, and OIS, a 50MP telephoto at 70mm equivalent with an ISOCELL JN5 sensor, an f/2.7 aperture, and OIS, and a 50MP ultra-wide at 15mm equivalent with another ISOCELL JN5 sensor, an f/2.0 aperture, and autofocus.

In daylight, the Find N6 delivers good detail, pleasing dynamic range, and generally accurate color, even if images tend to run slightly bright. The telephoto and ultra-wide are serviceable, while low light is where the limitations become more obvious, especially when there is movement in the scene.

Oppo does at least include a healthy set of features, including log video recording and XPan mode. There are also two 20MP selfie cameras, one on the outer display and one on the inner screen, though they feel more useful for video calls than for anything else. Video is also fairly capable, with all three rear cameras supporting up to 4K 60fps Dolby Vision HDR, while the main camera can go up to 4K 120fps Dolby Vision.

Battery and charging

The Find N6 packs a 6,000mAh battery, and in practice, it delivers strong battery life. Unless you are using the camera heavily, it can easily last a full day and more, which is a very good result for a foldable with two high-refresh-rate displays.

Charging is strong as well. The phone supports 80W wired and 50W wireless charging, which makes it easier to top up quickly when needed. That only adds to the sense that the Find N6 is easier to live with day to day than many foldables.

Sustainability

For a foldable, the Find N6 makes a fairly strong durability case. It carries IP56, IP58, and IP59 ratings, and Oppo also points to stronger materials and a more robust hinge design as part of the broader durability story. More importantly, it feels reassuringly solid in hand, which goes a long way in making the device seem built to last.

That is matched by fairly solid long-term support. The phone is TÜV Rheinland certified for one million folding cycles and has minimized crease performance after 600,000 folds, while Oppo promises five years of Android updates and six years of security patches. That may not fully define sustainability, but it does give the Find N6 a more convincing case for longevity.

Value

At a starting price of around $1,440 for 12 GB/256GB configuration ($1,580 for 16 GB/512GB and $1,730 for 16 GB/1TB), the Find N6 is firmly in premium territory, but it also makes one of the strongest value cases in the foldable market. The design is slim and polished, the crease is impressively well controlled, battery life is strong, and the multitasking experience makes the larger display feel genuinely useful. More importantly, it feels like a foldable that gets the fundamentals right rather than relying on novelty alone.

The price is still high, and the camera system does not quite match the best camera-focused flagships, so there are limits to how broadly its value can be argued. But within the foldable category, the Find N6 feels unusually complete and easier to justify than many of its rivals if you already know this is the form factor you want.

Conclusion

After spending time with the Find N6, I came away feeling that Oppo has done more than just refine the formula. This is one of the few foldables that feels designed around everyday use rather than the novelty of unfolding into a larger screen. The ergonomics are better than expected, the crease is remarkably well controlled, battery life is strong, and the software makes the larger display feel genuinely useful.

It is still an expensive device, and the camera system does not quite reach the level of the best camera-focused flagships. Even so, the more I used the Find N6, the more complete it felt. There is a level of polish here that remains rare in this category, and it makes a very strong case for itself as one of the best all-around foldables available right now.

The post Oppo Find N6 Review: The Best Foldable Phone Right Now first appeared on Yanko Design.

The mid-range smartphone segment is crowded in ways that make individual products hard to distinguish. Specs converge, designs flatten, and most phones feel interchangeable within days. vivo’s V70 enters that space with a clear point of view: a ZEISS-co-engineered telephoto camera tuned for stage photography and travel, a large battery built for long days, and a physical design that genuinely tries to look and feel like something worth keeping.

The v70 also introduces the Golden Hour edition, the most visually expressive option in the lineup, with an etched glass back, an aerospace-grade aluminum frame, and a ZEISS camera module with serious hardware inside. Running OriginOS 6 on a Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, it promises a telephoto-first camera experience for concerts and travel, backed by a 6,500mAh battery. Does the full package deliver on all of it? Read on.

Designer: vivo

Aesthetics

Of all the V70’s color options, the Golden Hour edition is the one most worth talking about. vivo uses a specialized chemical etching process to form micron-scale texture on the back glass, creating a diffuse reflection that reads as refined matte from a distance but reveals subtle warmth in direct light. It’s fingerprint-resistant and smooth without feeling slippery, a noticeably more considered finish than the glossy or painted backs that dominate this price tier.

What’s more surprising is that the back doesn’t stay a single color. Depending on the viewing angle and ambient lighting, it shifts toward a cooler, slightly bluish hue you wouldn’t expect from a finish called Golden Hour. That unexpected chromatic movement makes it more visually engaging than a standard gradient, the kind of surface detail that keeps catching your eye without you fully understanding why.

Around the front, the aerospace-grade aluminum alloy frame wraps a flat display with ultra-thin bezels measuring just 1.25 mm on the sides. Rounded corners soften the silhouette without cheapening it, and the flat screen is a deliberate departure from curved-edge designs that can distort content near the edges. The overall impression is controlled and considered rather than flashy, which suits the V70’s personality well.

On the back, the camera module is a rounded metallic rectangle sitting just 3.29mm above the surface, low enough that the phone doesn’t rock noticeably on a table. Three lens rings and a ZEISS badge keep the composition clean without feeling crowded. It’s a well-executed rear panel that reinforces the premium identity without needing extra ornamentation to make the point.

Ergonomics

At 194g light and 7.59mm thick in the Golden Hour configuration, the vivo V70 feels present without being heavy. The matte AG glass provides enough grip for confident one-handed use without a case, and the flat sides and rounded corners make it comfortable to hold at its screen size. Weight distribution is balanced, which matters more for all-day carry than any single spec on a data sheet.

The 3D Ultrasonic Fingerprint Scanning 2.0 is one of the more underrated features here. It works reliably with damp fingers, meaning no frustrating tap-and-retry cycle after a workout or a skincare routine. Best of all, it’s located a good distance away from the bottom, so you don’t have to precariously shift your hand from its natural holding position just to unlock the phone.

Performance

Under the hood, the vivo V70’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 with LPDDR5X memory and UFS 4.1 storage handles everyday tasks and multitasking without hesitation, and a 4,200mm² vapor chamber keeps sustained performance steady during longer camera sessions. It’s not a chipset that headlines benchmark charts, but it delivers consistent, smooth day-to-day performance, which is more relevant to what the V70 is actually designed for than theoretical peak numbers.

The 6.59-inch 1.5K OLED runs at 120Hz with 459 PPI and peaks at 5,000 nits local brightness, which holds up well in direct sunlight and makes reviewing photos outdoors genuinely practical. Colors are rich without being oversaturated, and the 1.07-billion color depth makes gradient-heavy AI-edited shots look smooth rather than banded. It’s one of the better mid-range displays available at this price tier right now.

The camera system’s two stars are the 50MP main and 50MP periscope telephoto. The main uses a Sony LYT-700V sensor with a 1/1.56-inch surface area and OIS, delivering consistent, detailed portraits across daylight and mixed lighting. The telephoto uses a 1/1.95-inch sensor with its own OIS and a periscope structure that enables 10x zoom in a compact body. Both cameras consistently outperform what you’d expect at this price.

Of the three rear cameras, the 8MP ultra-wide is where things get more ordinary. It’s functional for casual wide shots, but the gap in detail and dynamic range between it and the main and telephoto cameras is noticeable. Given the vivo V70’s travel ambitions, wide landscape shots will come out looking more ordinary than portraits taken at the same destination. The phone’s real camera personality clearly lives in the other two lenses.

AI Stage Mode is a genuine differentiator if you attend live events regularly. At 10x zoom from 10m to 20m away, the AI Image Enhancement Algorithm and AI Style Portrait Technology combine to pull facial detail and expression clarity from performers under challenging stage lighting. It won’t replace a dedicated camera at that distance, but for a phone that fits in your jacket pocket, the results hold up surprisingly well.

Video gets a meaningful upgrade with 4K 60fps, the first time the vivo V series has offered this, and footage looks cinematic when lighting cooperates. AI Audio Noise Eraser in post-editing selectively reduces wind noise, crowd chatter, or ambient sound from recorded clips. It sounds like a spec sheet bullet point until you actually try cleaning up a concert recording with it, and then it becomes a feature you’d miss on another phone.

Battery life is a genuine strength. The 6,500mAh BlueVolt battery with 90W FlashCharge handles a full day of heavy use and then some, including heavy video playback. Wireless charging still isn’t part of the package, though, which will matter to those who’ve built it into their daily routine, but fast wired charging and a genuinely large battery soften that trade-off considerably.

Sustainability

vivo commits to four generations of OS updates and 6 years of security patches for the V70, placing it firmly in the category of phones worth keeping rather than replacing every two years. That’s the most meaningful sustainability argument a phone can make, applying regardless of materials or recycling programs. Longer software support means slower obsolescence, and slower obsolescence means less electronic waste accumulating on a shelf somewhere.

IP68 and IP69 ratings, combined with what vivo calls 10-Facet Drop Resistance, lower the anxiety of carrying a polished phone through real conditions. IP69 covers high-pressure water jets, going well beyond typical rain scenarios. That durability confidence changes how casually you handle the phone day to day, and there’s something genuinely reassuring about owning a device you don’t have to constantly worry about.

The material choices also support long-term ownership. Aerospace-grade aluminum and etched AG glass age more gracefully than glossy plastic, which yellows, scratches, and starts looking tired within a year of daily use. The matte texture stays presentable with minimal cleaning, and IP68/IP69 combined with drop resistance gives the V70 a realistic chance of surviving the accidents that typically end mid-range phones early.

Value

The V70 packages premium design, a ZEISS telephoto-first camera system, a strong OLED display, fast charging, and long software support into a price tier that usually demands more compromises. The Golden Hour finish gives it a visual identity that stands above most phones at its price, and the combination of AI Stage Mode with ZEISS Multifocal Portrait focal lengths makes it genuinely specialized rather than just generically capable.

The 8MP ultra-wide is the honest weak spot, and travelers who rely heavily on wide shots will feel that gap. Wireless charging is also absent. But what the V70 does well, it does consistently, and the combination of a premium-feeling design, a capable telephoto system, and 6 years of security updates makes it a phone that’s easy to justify and hard to grow out of quickly.

Verdict

The vivo V70 in Golden Hour is one of the more cohesive mid-range phones available right now. The etched glass with its unexpected bluish shift, the aluminum frame, the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor, the bright 1.5K OLED, and the ZEISS telephoto and portrait system all work together in a way that makes the phone feel intentional rather than assembled from a spec sheet and a parts catalog.

The 8MP ultra-wide and the absence of wireless charging are unfortunate blemishes on what is otherwise a remarkably well-rounded package. Both are real trade-offs rather than dealbreakers, though, and the vivo V70 earns its place as a phone that’s genuinely hard to fault for what it costs, especially if portrait photography, concert shooting, and long battery life are what matter most to you.

The post vivo V70 Review: A Concert Photographer’s Phone in Mid-Range Clothes first appeared on Yanko Design.

Gaming phones have split off into their own design species, leaning into transparent backs, RGB lighting, and visible cooling that looks more like sci‑fi props than communication devices. The REDMAGIC 11 Pro, which we reviewed recently, took that to its extreme with a liquid‑cooling window showing coolant flowing like spaceship controls. It made a strong visual statement but was unapologetically a gamer’s machine first and everything else a distant second.

REDMAGIC 11 Air tries to keep the same esports‑grade performance, active cooling, and transparent style in a slimmer frame. It packs a Snapdragon 8 Elite, 7,000mAh battery, 6.85‑inch 144Hz OLED, and 24,000 RPM fan into a 7.85mm, 207g body. Whether this Air approach can balance hardcore gaming with something closer to everyday usability, or just becomes a slightly thinner version of the same uncompromising brick, is worth finding out.

Designer: REDMAGIC

Aesthetics

The moment you see the REDMAGIC 11 Air, it announces itself as a gaming phone. Phantom transparent black and Prism transparent white finishes expose stylized internals, circuit‑like etching, and RGB‑lit fan and logo elements. This is not subtle or generalist; it is a cyberpunk, sci‑fi motif that wants to sit next to mechanical keyboards rather than hide in a leather case.

Despite the gaming‑first aesthetic, materials feel more refined than expected. The aluminum alloy frame, Gorilla Glass front and back, and 7.85mm thickness give it a solid feel. It is positioned as the lightest in the REDMAGIC lineup, which matters compared to the heavier 11 Pro. The curves and 20:9 aspect ratio help it sit more naturally in the hand, even if the styling still clearly prioritizes gamers over minimalists.

RGB lighting and transparent elements add atmosphere without chaos. Fan and logo lights sync with in‑game audio, making the back feel alive during sessions, but both can be toned down or disabled when you want less conspicuous carry. That duality helps if you like the gaming aesthetic but occasionally need to bring the phone into neutral environments where flashing lights feel out of place.

Ergonomics

Living with the 11 Air daily, the slimmer and lighter design makes a real difference. Long landscape gaming sessions feel less fatiguing, and the phone slips into pockets more easily than expected, given the 6.85‑inch display. The curved back and aluminum frame help with grip, and the 20:9 screen ratio balances a wide gaming canvas with something that still fits in most hands without constant readjusting.

The large screen dominates the front with a 95.1% screen‑to‑body ratio and slim bezels. That is great for immersion, but leaves little room to rest thumbs without touching the screen during landscape play. Fortunately, the shoulder triggers take over some of that load, letting the screen act more like a viewfinder while the top edges handle key inputs when you need them most.

Controls are where the gaming focus becomes clear. The 520Hz physical shoulder triggers are tuned for low‑latency and now work in portrait and landscape, giving flexibility for different games. Combined with the 0809 X‑axis linear motor for 4D haptics, the phone feels more like a handheld console, especially when triggers are mapped to aiming or abilities through Game Space’s interface.

Outside of gaming, the transparent back and RGB accents may not suit every situation, but the size and weight make it easier to carry than the 11 Pro or older gaming phones. One‑handed use is still a stretch given the display size, but basic tasks like messaging and browsing feel manageable if you are already used to large phones or phablets.

Performance

At the core sits the Snapdragon 8 Elite paired with RedCore R4, LPDDR5X RAM, and UFS 4.1 storage. Clock speeds reach 4.32GHz on the Oryon CPU and 1,250MHz on the Adreno 830 GPU. The dedicated RedCore R4 and CUBE scheduling engine focuses on stable frame rates rather than just benchmark spikes, which matters more in sustained gaming, where consistency beats bursts.

The ICE Cooling System backs that up with a large vapor chamber, graphene thermal layers, and a 24,000 RPM turbo fan. Unlike the REDMAGIC 11 Pro’s dramatic liquid‑cooling window showing coolant flowing like sci‑fi, the REDMAGIC 11 Air hides cooling under the transparent back. It opts for slimness while still actively managing CPU and GPU temperatures during long sessions, which keeps performance from throttling halfway through a match.

The active cooling fan is audible when it spins up under heavy load. It is not loud enough to overpower game audio, but it is noticeable in quiet rooms. For a device prioritizing sustained performance, this is expected, and fan behavior can be tuned in Game Space if you prefer cooler operation or less noise during specific sessions or when gaming in shared spaces.

Cameras are solid without being the headline. The 50 MP main sensor with OIS delivers clean photos for social media and casual shots, and the 16 MP front camera handles selfies and video calls well enough. The 8MP ultra-wide camera is a bit of a disappointment in this day and age, but it’s not exactly terrible. These are clearly not camera‑phone specs, but they work fine for anyone who needs decent everyday photography alongside gaming.

Battery and charging are part of the performance story. The 7,000 mAh battery is generous in this slim chassis, going over a day with general use, and hours upon hours of binging video streaming at max brightness. The 80W fast charging refills quickly, while Charge Separation routes power to the motherboard during plugged‑in gaming, reducing heat and protecting battery health over time.

Worth noting is the absence of wireless charging. For a phone focused on performance and internal cooling, skipping wireless charging feels like a conscious choice to prioritize battery size, thermals, and layout. It is not a deal‑breaker with rapid wired charging, but it is worth keeping in mind if you are used to charging pads between sessions or overnight.

Sustainability

Durability starts with materials. The aluminum alloy frame, Gorilla Glass GG7i front, and Gorilla Glass 5 back give a solid, premium feel that should handle knocks better than plastic gaming phones. The combination of metal and tempered glass makes it feel built to survive being tossed into bags, dropped onto desks, and carried through crowds without showing age too quickly or feeling fragile.

IP54 dust and water resistance is a pragmatic compromise. For a device packed with vents, fans, and shoulder triggers, pushing water resistance higher would likely require trade‑offs in cooling capacity or thickness. The phone will survive light rain or dusty environments, but it is not meant for submersion or rough outdoor abuse, worth keeping in mind if you game near water or in harsh conditions.

Value

At launch, the REDMAGIC 11 Air starts at $499 ($529 in the US and Canada) for 12 GB + 256 GB and goes up to $599 ($629 in North America) for 16 GB + 512 GB. That puts it in upper mid‑range territory, but with hardware rivaling more expensive phones in gaming performance, especially when you factor in cooling, battery, and gaming‑specific controls that most flagships skip entirely.

Value shows up in what you get for that money. At this price, you are getting Snapdragon 8 Elite, active cooling with a 24,000 RPM fan and vapor chamber, 7,000mAh battery with 80W charging, 6.85‑inch 144Hz OLED, and 520 Hz shoulder triggers. Many similarly priced phones focus on cameras or slimness, leaving gaming performance to throttle once heat builds, so the 11 Air feels like a focused tool rather than a jack‑of‑all‑trades.

Of course, this focus narrows the audience. The transparent, RGB‑lit, cyberpunk design and heavy emphasis on Game Space features, triggers, and haptics make the 11 Air most appealing to mobile gamers. For someone who barely plays and cares more about camera versatility or minimalist aesthetics, much of what makes this device interesting will feel like overkill or actively off‑putting.

Contrasting it with the REDMAGIC 11 Pro helps clarify positioning. The Pro leans harder into showpiece territory with its visible liquid‑cooling window and heavier footprint, while the 11 Air trades some spectacle for slimness and lighter weight. For gamers who want REDMAGIC’s performance and style but prefer something easier to carry daily, the Air’s pricing and positioning make sense as a more practical but still gaming‑centric option.

Verdict

REDMAGIC 11 Air takes the brand’s familiar ingredients, transparent design, RGB accents, active cooling, shoulder triggers, and wraps them in a slimmer chassis that feels more manageable than previous monsters. It does not pretend to be a mainstream flagship, but within its lane of delivering stable high‑fps gaming and distinct visual identity, it hits targets convincingly. The flagship silicon, thermal management, and gaming controls make it hard to ignore if mobile gaming matters to you.

For people who treat mobile gaming seriously and who like the idea of a semi‑transparent, cyber‑mech slab with a fan inside more than a polished glass rectangle, REDMAGIC 11 Air makes a strong case. It will not convert everyone, and it is not trying to, but for the crowd it speaks to, it offers a rare mix of performance, personality, and practicality at a price undercutting many conventional flagships while still feeling like a purpose‑built tool.

The post REDMAGIC 11 Air Review: Fan-cooled Gaming Flagship at Just 207g, $499 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Flare Yellow bodywork catches parking garage fluorescents like a warning flare. Quad exhaust tips broadcast displacement before you turn the key. The 2025 Lexus IS 500 F SPORT Performance Premium arrives unapologetic while most luxury sedans in 2025 spend their energy explaining away downsized engines and turbocharger compromises. In a market segment that has largely abandoned both of those choices, this combination reads less like a product strategy and more like a design philosophy made physical. The sedan occupies a strange position: compact luxury dimensions wrapped around powertrain architecture that most competitors retired years ago. That tension between contemporary shell and analog holdout defines every interaction with the car, from the first ignition cycle to the hundredth highway merge.

Designer: Lexus

Flare Yellow is not simply a paint option here. Lexus positions it as a complete appearance system, bundling 19 inch black forged alloy wheels, Ultrasuede interior inserts with yellow stitching, matching seatbelts, illuminated door sills, and coordinated floor mats. The color becomes a unifying thread that connects exterior surfacing to cabin touchpoints, transforming what could be a single aesthetic choice into an integrated material language. At $4,050 for the package, the investment purchases coherence rather than mere visibility.

Exterior Form Language

Aggression arrives through geometry rather than applied decoration. The spindle grille dominates the frontal view, its lattice pattern creating depth and shadow that shifts with viewing angle and ambient light. Triple beam LED headlamps flank the grille, their layered optical elements suggesting technical complexity even at rest. The overall stance sits low and wide, with wheel arches that fill their openings without the exaggerated flaring that characterizes some performance variants.

Moving rearward, the roofline descends in a continuous arc that terminates at a ducktail spoiler integrated into the trunk lid. Quad exhaust tips emerge from the rear diffuser, their stacked arrangement serving as the primary visual signal of the V8 beneath. The proportion relationship between greenhouse and body mass reads as deliberately compact, the cabin volume compressed relative to the sculptural surfaces surrounding it. This creates the impression of a machine built around its mechanical core rather than a passenger compartment with propulsion attached. The 19 inch wheels and aggressive fender surfacing work to visually manage nearly 4,000 pounds, making the car read lighter and wider than the scales suggest.

Interior Material Hierarchy

Inside, tactile engagement takes priority over digital spectacle. NuLuxe trimmed seats provide the primary contact surface, their bolstering firm enough to communicate sport intent without creating discomfort during extended use. The Ultrasuede inserts in the Flare Yellow package introduce texture variation that catches fingertips differently than the surrounding synthetic leather, establishing a sensory hierarchy across the seating surfaces.

The steering wheel arrives wrapped in leather with a heated element, its rim diameter and grip circumference calibrated for hands that expect direct mechanical feedback. Aluminum pedals replace the standard rubber units, their knurled surfaces providing positive purchase under aggressive inputs. Satin trim accents break up the interior darkness, creating visual rhythm without the reflective distraction of polished chrome.

The Mark Levinson audio system occupies the acoustic environment with authority. Its 17 speakers deliver the kind of spatial imaging that justifies the premium trim designation, filling the cabin with presence that matches the V8’s mechanical drama.

 

The interface through which that system operates represents the cabin’s most significant temporal artifact. A 10.3 inch touchscreen accepts finger input but also responds to a trackpad controller mounted on the center console, a legacy interface element that creates immediate friction. Reaching for the screen to tap a climate shortcut feels natural until you remember the trackpad exists; defaulting to the trackpad means dragging a cursor across a surface designed for touch. Two design eras compete on the same console, and neither fully wins.

Powertrain as Sensory Design

Numbers tell part of the story: 472 horsepower at 7,100 rpm from a 5.0 liter V8. What matters more is how that power arrives. Natural aspiration means throttle response arrives without the intervention of turbocharger spool, creating a direct relationship between pedal position and acoustic output. The engine announces its presence through a broadband exhaust note that builds intensity with engine speed, the quad tips providing the exit path for a sound that functions as the car’s primary experiential feature.

The sprint to 60 arrives in the mid four second range, figures that place the IS 500 behind several turbocharged competitors on paper. The gap narrows in lived experience because the V8 delivers its power in a linear curve rather than a turbocharged surge, allowing the driver to modulate output with precision that boost dependent systems struggle to match. The eight speed automatic transmission shifts cleanly in sport mode, though it lacks the dual clutch immediacy that defines the segment’s sharper offerings.

Rear wheel drive completes the mechanical architecture, a configuration increasingly rare in this segment where all wheel drive has become the default assumption. The Torsen limited slip differential, a helical gear system that transfers torque mechanically rather than through electronic intervention, manages power distribution to the rear axle. Its purely mechanical operation provides predictable behavior at the adhesion limit, sending power to whichever wheel has grip without the response lag of clutch pack systems. Exiting a tight corner under throttle, the result is smooth, progressive traction rather than the sudden electronic clamp of stability nannies fighting for control. Adaptive suspension and upgraded brakes with enhanced cooling address the chassis requirements of the additional powertrain mass, though these systems tune toward comfort rather than track aggression.

Dynamic Compromise

Nearly 4,000 pounds announces itself the moment the road curves. The IS 500 weighs approximately 3,973 pounds in tested configuration, mass that reveals its presence during direction changes and hard braking. Push beyond street driving limits and understeer arrives predictably, the front tires reaching their grip threshold before the rear can rotate the chassis. The steering provides adequate weight but filters road texture in ways that prioritize refinement over information density. These are characteristics of a car tuned for daily use rather than weekend autocross, a calibration choice that aligns with the comfort of the seats and the isolation of the cabin.

The brake pedal requires calibration of expectations, its initial travel soft before building resistance. This tuning prioritizes smoothness during traffic deceleration but reduces confidence during aggressive threshold braking. Stability control intervention arrives earlier than competitors allow, limiting the exploration of chassis dynamics even when the driver seeks that engagement.

On a fast two lane road at seven tenths, the character clarifies. The V8 pulls cleanly out of corners while the chassis absorbs mid corner bumps that would unsettle lighter, stiffer competitors. Push harder and the front washes wide, but within the envelope of spirited street driving, the balance feels deliberate rather than deficient.

These compromises reflect a deliberate design decision: Lexus tuned for the commute, not the canyon. That calibration disappoints enthusiasts seeking sharper responses but serves the owner who wants to live with a V8 daily. The IS 500 prioritizes living with the V8 rather than extracting its maximum potential, a choice that makes the powertrain accessible across driving contexts rather than demanding specific conditions for enjoyment.

Value Positioning and Market Context

At $69,539 as tested, including destination and the Flare Yellow appearance package, the IS 500 positions itself against both four cylinder luxury sedans and more focused performance machinery. The competitive landscape has shifted around this car: BMW offers turbocharged inline sixes, Mercedes deploys electrified four cylinders, and Alfa Romeo provides sharper dynamics at similar price points. Against this field, the IS 500 competes on differentiation rather than specification superiority.

Fuel economy penalties are explicit and substantial. The EPA rates the powertrain at 17 mpg city, 25 highway, and 20 combined, figures that translate to approximately $3,200 in annual fuel costs. Over five years, that adds roughly $6,500 more than average. Environmental ratings land at 4 out of 10 for both fuel economy and smog, reflecting the consequences of maintaining natural aspiration while competitors optimize for regulatory compliance.

The value proposition depends on what the buyer prioritizes. Powertrain character over lap times. Exhaust note over efficiency. Mechanical simplicity over technological sophistication. For those criteria, the IS 500 delivers experiences its competitors have abandoned. The car exists because Lexus chose to preserve something rather than optimize everything.

Design Intent Realized

As a design object, the IS 500 F SPORT Performance Premium prioritizes a specific experience over balanced capability. The naturally aspirated V8 in rear wheel drive configuration represents a powertrain topology that market forces are eliminating, preserved here in a package refined enough for daily use. Flare Yellow demonstrates how color can function as a design element rather than a decorative choice, unifying interior and exterior into a coherent material statement.

Limitations and character prove inseparable. The weight that softens handling also supports the sound deadening that makes the V8 a companion rather than an assault. The infotainment system that frustrates also maintains the physical controls and clear hierarchy that digital native interfaces have abandoned. Fuel consumption that punishes the wallet finances the displacement that creates the acoustic experience.

Assembled in Tahara, Japan, the IS 500 wears a five star safety rating from NHTSA across all categories. It arrives as a complete product rather than a work in progress. Its design intent is preservation: holding space for a powertrain philosophy while the industry accelerates toward electrification. Whether that intent justifies the compromises depends on what the buyer believes is worth keeping alive. That Flare Yellow paint catching light in a parking garage announces the same thing the V8 announces at redline: this machine refused to apologize. For the driver who values mechanical tactility over interface novelty, the IS 500 answers a question the rest of the segment stopped asking.

The post 2025 Lexus IS 500 F SPORT Performance Review: Designing Space for a V8 in an Electrified World first appeared on Yanko Design.

Poco built its name on phones that punch above their price, and now it wants to do the same on your coffee table. With Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1, the brand is not just throwing out a couple of cheap tablets. It is trying to turn its budget DNA into a fuller ecosystem that covers gaming, work, and everyday media.

You can feel that ambition in how these two models are drawn. The Poco Pad X1 is a slightly more compact, high refresh performance slate, tuned for games and quick multitasking on an 11.2-inch 3.2K display. The Poco Pad M1 steps up to a 12.1-inch 2.5K panel and the largest battery Poco has ever shipped in a global device, aiming to be the big screen that carries you through movies, sketching sessions, and long days away from a charger.

Designer: Poco

If you have been eyeing an affordable Android tablet for gaming, streaming, or light work, should you reach for the sharper, faster Poco Pad X1, or the larger, more relaxed Poco Pad M1? In this review, we will live with both, compare their strengths, and help you decide which one actually fits your desk, your bag, and your budget.

Aesthetics

Poco is not trying to reinvent tablet hardware with Poco Pad X1 or Poco Pad M1. Both follow a familiar rectangle with rounded corners, flat sides, and a camera module that sits quietly in one corner. On Poco Pad X1, the focus is clearly on framing its 11.2-inch display as efficiently as possible. Poco Pad M1 takes the same basic formula and scales it up with a 12.1-inch panel.

Color choices on the Pad X1 and the Pad M1 are simple. They both come in Grey and Blue. Grey leans more gunmetal and understated with a contrasting yellow accent around the camera module, while Blue reads a little more casual and friendly, but neither option is loud or experimental. Both tablets use a metal unibody design for the main shell, with separate parts for the camera island and buttons, and a big Poco logo stamped in the center for instant brand recognition. The Poco Pad X1 uses a square camera island, while the Poco Pad M1 switches to a softer oval, which gives each model a slightly different signature when you flip them over.

Taken together, the two tablets look exactly like what they are meant to be. They are straightforward, modern Android slabs that fade into the background and let their screens and specs do the talking. For budget-friendly hardware, that quiet, functional design approach feels like the right call.

Ergonomics

In the hand, the main ergonomic difference between Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1 is simply size and weight, but neither is a true one-handed tablet for long stretches. The Poco Pad X1, with its 11.2-inch footprint and 500 g weight, is the more compact of the two. It is easier to manage on a sofa or in bed than the larger Poco Pad M1, but you will still want a second hand or some support if you are holding it for a long time. Even though the Poco Pad X1 is relatively slim and light for an aluminum unibody tablet with an 8,850 mAh battery, with dimensions of 251.22 x 173.42 x 6.18 mm, it does not quietly disappear in one hand the way a smaller 8 or 9-inch device might.

Poco Pad M1 stretches that template out to a 12.1-inch diagonal with dimensions of 279.8 x 181.65 x 7.5 mm and a weight of about 610 g, which puts it clearly into big tablet territory. It is still slim, but the larger footprint makes it even less suited to long one-handed use, especially if you are moving around. Instead, it feels more like a tablet you rest on a table, prop up with a cover, or pair with its official keyboard, where the extra screen real estate really pays off for split-screen apps, video, and drawing.

The accessory ecosystem around the Pad X1 and the Pad M1 makes them versatile, but in slightly different ways. Poco Pad M1 is compatible with the optional Poco Pad M1 Keyboard, Poco Smart Pen, and Poco Pad M1 Cover, a trio that turns it into a very capable small-screen workstation. The cover folds into a stand and adds a built-in holder for the pen, which makes it easy to move between bag, desk, and sofa without worrying about where the stylus went. The keyboard is lightweight and easy to carry, but the keys feel a bit plasticky in use, which slightly undercuts the otherwise solid metal body of the tablet.

Poco Pad X1 has its own dedicated set of accessories. It supports the Poco Pad X1 Floating Keyboard, the Poco Pad X1 Keyboard, the Poco Focus Pen, and the Poco Pad X1 Cover, which together give it a surprisingly flexible setup for both work and play. The cover folds like origami and doubles as a stand, letting you enjoy the tablet vertically or horizontally, and for horizontal use, you can choose between two different viewing heights.

The Floating Keyboard is the standout here. It adds some weight and only offers a modest tilt range, but the key feel is excellent for this class, and the trackpad is responsive and accurate enough that you quickly forget you are on a tablet accessory. Clipped together, the Poco Pad X1 and the Floating Keyboard behave much more like a compact laptop than a budget slate with an afterthought keyboard, which makes it far easier to treat this smaller tablet as a real writing and work machine when you need it.
 

Performance

Living with Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1 quickly shows how differently they lean, even though they share a lot of DNA. The Poco Pad X1 is the sharper and faster option, with an 11.2-inch 3.2K display at 3,200 x 2,136 px, around 345 ppi, and refresh up to 144 Hz in supported apps. It can hit about 800 nits peak brightness, supports Dolby Vision and HDR10, and uses a 3:2 aspect ratio that feels very natural for reading, web browsing, and document work, helped by TÜV eye care, DC dimming, and adaptive colors to keep things comfortable.

The Poco Pad M1, on the other hand, trades a bit of sharpness and speed for sheer size and flexibility. Its 12.1-inch 2.5K panel runs at 2,560 x 1,600px with around 249 ppi and up to 120 Hz refresh, plus 500 nits typical and 600 nits in high brightness mode. You still get Dolby Vision, DC dimming, and TÜV certifications for low blue light, flicker-free behavior, and circadian friendliness, along with wet touch support that keeps it usable with damp fingers.

Both tablets use quad speakers with Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res support, so you get surprisingly full sound from either. Crucially, the Poco Pad M1 also adds a 3.5 mm headphone jack and a microSD slot for up to 2 TB of expandable storage, which makes it a much easier media hoarder and a better fit for wired headphones and speakers. The X1 relies on its internal storage and wireless audio instead, which suits its more performance-driven, travel-friendly role.

Performance and gaming clearly favor the Poco Pad X1. It uses the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 with 8 GB of RAM and up to 512 GB of storage, and combined with the 144 Hz panel, it feels like a handheld console that also happens to be good at multitasking and productivity. The Poco Pad M1 steps down to the Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 with 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage, which is still more than enough for apps and casual gaming, but clearly tuned more for streaming, browsing, and note-taking than for chasing every last frame. In practice, the Poco Pad X1 is the one you reach for when you care about smooth, high refresh gameplay, while the Pad M1 is the one you leave on the coffee table for everyone to use.

Battery life follows the same logic. The Poco Pad X1 pairs its 8,850 mAh battery with 45 W turbo charging, which Poco says can go from zero to full in about 94 minutes, and my experience matches that claim in day-to-day use. The Poco Pad M1 leans into a 12,000 mAh pack, billed as the largest battery in a global Poco device, with up to 105.36 hours of music playback, around 83 days of standby, 33 W charging, and up to 27 W wired reverse charging so it can top up your other devices.

On the software side, both run Xiaomi HyperOS with Xiaomi Interconnectivity and Google’s AI hooks, so you get shared clipboard, call and network sync, Circle to Search, and Gemini support whichever size you choose. As for cameras, Poco Pad X1 pairs a 13 MP rear camera and an 8 MP front camera, while Poco Pad M1 sticks to 8 MP sensors on both sides. The results are perfectly fine for video calls, document scans, and the odd quick snap, but nothing special, which is exactly what you would expect from tablets at this price bracket.

Sustainability

Poco is not making a big environmental branding play with Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1, but there are a few practical touches that matter if you plan to keep a tablet for several years. The most important one is long-term software support. Both Pad X1 and Pad M1 are slated to receive four years of security updates, which gives you a clearer runway for safe everyday use. For budget tablets, that commitment is still not guaranteed across the market, so it is good to see Poco spell it out.

 
That longer support window pairs well with the hardware choices. The aluminum unibody shells on both models feel sturdy enough to survive several upgrade cycles, and the generous storage options, plus microSD expansion on the Poco Pad M1, reduce the pressure to replace them early just to fit more apps or media. It is not a full sustainability story with recycled materials and carbon tracking, but if your definition of sustainable starts with buying something that will not feel obsolete or unsafe in two years, these tablets are at least pointed in the right direction.

Value

The Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1 both land in the affordable bracket, but they scale very differently once you add accessories. The Poco Pad X1 with 8 GB of RAM and 512 GB of storage is $399 USD, which feels fair for the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 and high-end 3.2K 144 hertz display. Its accessories are priced like mini laptop gear, with the Floating Keyboard at $199 USD, the X1 Keyboard at $129 USD, the X1 Cover at $49 USD, and the Poco Focus Pen at $99 USD. A fully loaded X1 setup quickly pushes past $600 USD, but in return, you get a compact tablet that can genuinely stand in for a small laptop and drawing pad.

The Poco Pad M1 starts cheaper at $329 USD for 8 GB and 256 GB, and its add-ons stay firmly in value territory. The M1 Keyboard is $99 USD, the M1 Cover is $29 USD, and the Poco Smart Pen is $69 USD, so even a complete kit undercuts an equivalently kitted X1 by a healthy margin. Factor in the microSD slot and 3.5 millimeter headphone jack, and M1 clearly aims to be the better deal for big screen media, note-taking, and family use, while X1 makes more sense if you are willing to pay extra for performance, storage, and that excellent Floating Keyboard experience.

Verdict

The Poco Pad X1 and Poco Pad M1 end up serving two somewhat different roles. If you prioritize performance, the Poco Pad X1 is the clear choice. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, 3.2K 144 Hz display, 512 GB storage, and excellent Floating Keyboard make it feel like a serious little work and gaming machine, even if the full setup gets expensive and you give up the headphone jack and SD slot. If you care more about big-screen comfort and value, the Poco Pad M1 quietly wins. The 12.1-inch 2.5K screen, quad speakers, 3.5 mm jack, microSD expansion, huge battery, and cheaper accessories make it a better fit for big-screen media and everyday productivity.

Whichever way you lean, you are getting more tablet than the price suggests. For context, Apple’s base iPad costs $449 with only 64 GB of storage and a 60 Hz screen. The iPad still has a faster processor and a tighter app ecosystem, but Poco gives you bigger batteries, sharper displays, and a lot more storage for less money. Pick the Poco Pad X1 if you want compact power and a great keyboard experience. Pick the Poco Pad M1 if you want maximum screen, battery, and flexibility for the money. Either way, you end up with a tablet that feels more considered than most of what you will find at this price.

The post Poco Pad X1 & Poco Pad M1 Review: Budget Tablets That Challenge the iPad first appeared on Yanko Design.

The 2025 Elantra N arrived at my driveway on a Monday morning, and within the first five minutes behind the wheel, I understood why Hyundai’s N division has earned its reputation. This is not a compromised daily driver with sporty aspirations. This is a legitimate performance machine that happens to be practical enough for grocery runs.

Designer: Hyundai

At around $33,000, the Elantra N undercuts the Honda Civic Type R by roughly $11,000 while delivering 276 horsepower through a chassis that feels purpose-built for enthusiast driving. That price gap matters, especially when you consider what you’re getting for the money.

Design and Ergonomics: Cohesive Performance Inside and Out

Hyundai’s “circuit sophistication” shows up everywhere: from the functional front intakes and aero management outside to the way your hands, eyes, and torso interface with the car inside. The Elantra N looks planted because it is, and the cockpit is arranged to help you drive it that way.

Air is managed with purpose outside; inputs are managed with equal intent inside. The N-mode buttons live exactly where your thumbs fall, the paddles are immediate, and the thick-rim wheel keeps your hands quiet and steady. Grippy suede on key touch zones favors control over flash. The heavily bolstered seats don’t just photograph sporty. They hold you when lateral loads build, without punishing you in the commute. Seat bolstering and hip-point height align with the car’s low roll attitude, so you feel the chassis working rather than bracing against it.

Information carries the same restraint. The N-specific cluster surfaces telemetry you want when you’re pushing, yet it never overwhelms during a coffee run. Compared to the GR Corolla’s rally bravado or the Type R’s anime aggression, Hyundai’s drama feels purposeful rather than performative. The Volkswagen GTI offers restrained elegance, the Golf R delivers understated menace, but Hyundai targets buyers who want their performance intentions visible from three lanes away.

If you want your performance car to advertise its intent from three lanes over, the Elantra N obliges. If you want the cockpit to back that up with clean ergonomics and low noise-to-signal while you’re actually driving, it does that, too. The N-specific blue accents and geometric wheel design create visual cohesion that feels intentional rather than applied by committee.

Technology That Stays Out Of The Way

The 10.25-inch touchscreen runs Hyundai’s latest infotainment system with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The interface is responsive and logical. I never fumbled through menus trying to find basic functions. The navigation system worked reliably, though I primarily used CarPlay during my test week.

Hyundai’s SmartSense safety suite is standard, including forward collision warning, blind-spot monitoring, and lane-keeping assist. The systems work unobtrusively in Normal mode. They’re more intrusive in Sport modes, which makes sense because the car is more aggressive in those settings. You can disable most features if they annoy you.

The sound system is good but not exceptional. It’s clear and reasonably powerful, adequate for daily use but not audiophile-grade. The active exhaust provides most of the soundtrack anyway, especially in Sport mode where it pops and crackles on overrun like a proper performance car should.

Daily Driving Reality Check

I drove the Elantra N for seven days as my only vehicle. I ran errands, sat in traffic, made highway trips, and attacked back roads whenever the opportunity presented itself. The car excelled in all those scenarios without demanding unreasonable compromises.

Fuel economy averaged 25 mpg in my mixed driving, which included plenty of enthusiastic acceleration and some sustained highway cruising. The EPA rates it at 22 city and 31 highway. Those numbers are realistic if you can resist the urge to use all that power constantly.

The ride quality is firm but never harsh. The engine note at highway speeds is present but not intrusive. The wind noise is well-controlled. This is a car you can live with every day without feeling like you’re making sacrifices for performance capability.

The Competition Context

The Honda Civic Type R costs around $44,000 and offers 315 horsepower with more aggressive styling. It’s the benchmark for front-wheel-drive performance, and it holds that crown for good reason. But that $11,000 price gap is significant, especially when the Elantra N delivers 90% of the Type R’s capability at 75% of the cost.

The Volkswagen GTI offers hot hatch refinement at a similar price point but with less power and a softer character. It’s the mature choice where the Elantra N is the enthusiast’s choice.

What Works And What Doesn’t

The Elantra N succeeds because Hyundai committed fully to the performance mission without half-measures. The chassis is properly sorted. The engine delivers usable power across the rev range. The DCT transmission offers performance and convenience in equal measure. The brakes inspire confidence. These fundamentals matter more than any individual feature or specification.

The styling won’t appeal to everyone. It’s aggressive with large intakes, a prominent rear wing, and N-branded blue accents throughout. You’ll either love the look or find it too much. There’s no middle ground, and Hyundai clearly doesn’t care about attracting buyers who want subtle performance.

The ride quality might be too firm for some buyers, particularly in Sport modes. If you prioritize comfort over handling precision, this probably isn’t your car. But if you value dynamic capability and driving engagement, the firm suspension makes sense.

The Bottom Line

The 2025 Hyundai Elantra N with the 8-speed DCT delivers legitimate performance sedan capability at a price that undercuts its primary competition by thousands of dollars. It’s quick, engaging, practical enough for daily use, and genuinely fun to drive hard. Hyundai’s N division has proven it can build cars that satisfy enthusiast drivers without requiring premium pricing.

This is the performance sedan for buyers who want the driving experience without the luxury brand markup. It’s honest, capable, and more enjoyable than its price tag suggests it has any right to be. After a week of driving it in every scenario from rush hour traffic to empty back roads, I came away impressed by how well Hyundai balanced performance and practicality.

The automatic transmission adds a layer of accessibility without compromising the car’s enthusiast credentials. Whether you’re navigating downtown traffic or attacking a favorite back road, the DCT adapts seamlessly to deliver exactly the experience you want.

If you’re shopping for a performance sedan under $35,000, the Elantra N deserves serious consideration. It’s not trying to be everything to everyone. It’s focused on delivering driving enjoyment, and it succeeds without apology.

The Subaru WRX starts around $32,000 with all-wheel drive and 271 horsepower. It’s a different character entirely, built for rally-inspired traction rather than front-wheel-drive dynamics. The WRX feels more utilitarian where the Elantra N feels more refined.

The post The 2025 Hyundai Elantra N: Korea’s Performance Statement That Actually Delivers first appeared on Yanko Design.