Salt Spring Island doesn’t need much convincing — it already has the cliffs, the meadows, and the trees. The name sounds more like a childhood storybook setting than an architectural statement — and that tension is exactly the point. Nestled amidst the trees and rugged cliffs of Salt Spring Island, BC, the Daisy Ranch is Olson Kundig’s most recent residential project, led by design principal Tom Kundig. It’s casual. It’s rugged. And it’s entirely, unapologetically itself.

The house sits at the edge of a sweeping meadow, anchored by a log structure that feels like it could have always been there. The primary move is a rugged glass box paired with a long, cantilevered roof that stretches over a generous deck — a roof that earns its keep through BC’s shifting seasons, offering shelter without closing anything off. What makes it work visually is the layering: large square-cut logs and glass soften the rust-colored patina of weathered steel cladding, giving the exterior a palette that feels earned rather than designed.

Designer: Olsun Kundig

The plan is organized along a clean linear axis, with two distinct volumes bisected by an eastern entry stairway. The front door is tucked under a generous overhang — a small but considered gesture that grounds the arrival sequence without dramatizing it. The northern volume, clad in wood and steel, handles the private program: a primary suite and additional bedrooms, with framed view corridors that offer deliberate glimpses of the landscape rather than full exposure. Privacy and connection, calibrated carefully.

Inside, the bathroom is where the project gets most personal. Widespread use of wood infuses the space with warmth, while a clawfoot tub set before corner windows underscores the home’s persistent connection to the landscape outside. It’s the kind of detail that feels borrowed from an older, more tactile way of building — which is precisely the intention.

The project was designed in close collaboration with the client, Patrick Powers, a builder and fabricator who also served as general contractor. That relationship left its mark. The house doesn’t feel like it was delivered to a site; it feels like it was made with the site, material decision by material decision.

As Kundig put it: “There’s a lineage at play in this project, a quiet innovation that comes from the shared DNA of materials and relationships.” The Daisy Ranch is the kind of project that doesn’t need to announce itself. It sits lightly on its land, opens wide to its meadow, and gets on with the business of being lived in.

The post Inside the Log-and-Glass Home Olson Kundig Built for a Builder on Salt Spring Island first appeared on Yanko Design.

Light has always been design’s most underrated material. We talk endlessly about furniture, textiles, and surfaces, but light? It usually plays the supporting role, the thing that makes everything else look good. Preciosa Lighting is quietly changing that conversation, and their latest collection, Drifting Lights, might be the most convincing argument they’ve made yet.

The Czech brand has been doing this long enough to know the difference between novelty and genuine craft. Their heritage is rooted in traditional glassmaking, but what they’ve built with Drifting Lights feels like a very deliberate step forward. Each piece is made up of oblong and square glass panels slotted into a stainless-steel frame that discreetly conceals an LED strip. Inside each panel, the glass has been infused with countless tiny air bubbles. When light passes through, it doesn’t just illuminate the glass. It gets lost in it, scattering through those bubbles in a way that looks less like electricity and more like light deciding where it wants to go.

Designer: Preciousa Lighting

For Milan Design Week 2026, Preciosa is bringing the full Drifting Lights experience to the Tempesta Art Gallery in Brera, and the scale alone is worth paying attention to. The installation spans approximately 30 square metres and features 60 glass panels suspended vertically and horizontally, forming a structure measuring 8.7 by 3.2 by 3 metres. Set against a dark interior, the panels will be animated using 3D spatial mapping and RGBW technology, cycling through colour sequences from red to pink to green. Co-Creative Directors Michael Vasku and Andreas Klug put it plainly: the installation aims at “creating space to slow down, pause and wonder.”

I appreciate that framing, because Milan Design Week is genuinely relentless. Every brand is competing for the loudest moment, the most shareable installation, the boldest statement. There is a real temptation to optimise for the 15-second video clip rather than the actual experience of standing in a room. Preciosa is betting on the opposite, and I think that’s the smarter play. The colour sequence from red to pink to green reads like an emotional arc rather than a tech demo, referencing love, passion, and inner peace. Whether or not you buy the symbolism, you can’t argue with the atmosphere it creates.

A design object earns its place when it works just as well outside a gallery as inside one, and Drifting Lights has clearly been thought through on that level. The panels come in ten sizes, with different metal frame finishes and the option to orient them vertically or horizontally. The same collection can fill a grand hotel lobby or anchor a living room without losing its character. For bespoke projects, Preciosa can apply a painting technique that introduces pigment bubbles into the glass, giving each panel a layer of quiet individuality. The bubbled glass can also be enhanced with their Fused Veil pattern, which shifts the direction of light and adds even more visual complexity.

Under static illumination, Drifting Lights is calm and composed. Switch to dynamic mode and the panels come alive, with light moving from one to the next like ink dispersing through water. The gradients bloom, soften, and recombine. It’s the kind of effect that makes you stay in a room longer than you planned, which is, ultimately, what great lighting is supposed to do.

Preciosa has had a strong run at Fuorisalone in recent years, with recognised installations at Zona Tortona and Euroluce. The move to Tempesta on Foro Buonaparte suits the work well: a contemporary art gallery setting that lets the installation breathe without competing with showroom furniture. It’s a confident choice for a collection that clearly doesn’t need much help making a room feel different. If you’re heading to Milan, the installation runs April 20 to 26 at the Tempesta Art Gallery on Foro Buonaparte, and this one is worth the detour.

The post Preciosa To Make Light Feel Like a Living Thing at Milan 2026 first appeared on Yanko Design.

Four years is a long time in smartphone design, long enough for entire product categories to rise, peak, and fade. Samsung has cycled through multiple foldable generations. Google has rebooted its Pixel lineup twice. Nothing has gone from startup curiosity to legitimate contender. Apple, meanwhile, has kept the Dynamic Island exactly where it was when it debuted with the iPhone 14 Pro, same width, same height, same visual footprint. Leaked screen protectors for the iPhone 18 Pro, sourced from Weibo, suggest that Apple has finally decided four years is long enough.

According to the leak, the infrared flood illuminator that powers Face ID is moving under the display on the iPhone 18 Pro, leaving only the infrared camera requiring a physical cutout alongside the front-facing lens. The result is a Dynamic Island roughly 35% smaller than what ships on the iPhone 17 Pro today. Apple is also expected to pair this with its first 2nm chip, the A20 Pro, along with a variable aperture system on the main camera. The 20th anniversary iPhone in 2027 is widely expected to go further with a fully clean display, but the 18 Pro represents the clearest signal yet that Apple is working its way there on a deliberate schedule.

Image Credits: Weibo

The size reduction is more significant than the percentage suggests when you look at the two side by side. The iPhone 17 Pro’s Island is a wide, commanding presence even at rest. The 18 Pro’s leaked cutout reads almost delicate by comparison, a narrow pill sitting unobtrusively at the top of the screen. Apple will still need to revisit four years of Live Activities design and the entire interaction vocabulary built around the existing Island’s dimensions, which is a reasonable explanation for why this transition is taking as long as it is.

Android manufacturers have shipped under-display cameras for years, with visible quality tradeoffs that Apple’s user base simply would not accept on a thousand-dollar phone. Holding the line until the technology meets the standard, rather than shipping it to win a spec sheet argument, is the kind of call that frustrates people in the short term and builds loyalty over time. The iPhone 18 Pro may read as a modest update on paper. That smaller pill tells a different story.

The post Leaked iPhone 18 Pro Screen Protector Shows A 35% Smaller Dynamic Island first appeared on Yanko Design.

Two-wheelers have always demanded a certain level of skill and balance from riders, especially at low speeds or when navigating crowded city streets. OMO X by Omoway attempts to change that equation by introducing what the company describes as the world’s first mass-produced self-balancing electric motorcycle. Designed around advanced robotics and artificial intelligence, the new age electric bike blends traditional scooter convenience with autonomous technology that aims to make urban mobility easier and safer.

At the core of the two-wheeler is Omoway’s newly introduced OMO-ROBOT architecture, a full-stack control platform that integrates sensors, perception systems, decision-making software, and mechanical actuation into a unified framework. The system combines aerospace-grade gyroscope technology with reinforcement-learning models to continuously stabilize the motorcycle. This architecture allows the OMO X to maintain balance on its own, even when stationary, eliminating one of the biggest challenges riders face on two-wheeled vehicles.

Designer: Omoway

The balancing capability is achieved through a Control Moment Gyroscope (CMG) module. Using the principle of angular momentum, the spinning gyroscope actively stabilizes the vehicle, keeping it upright without rider input. Beyond simply preventing tip-overs, the system also supports a range of riding assistance features. These include slip prevention on wet surfaces, assistance while cornering, and obstacle-avoidance capabilities designed to enhance safety during everyday riding.

Omoway is also positioning the OMO X as a highly intelligent mobility device. The scooter incorporates a network of sensors and cameras that continuously monitor the surrounding environment and feed data into an AI-based riding system. This enables features such as adaptive speed adjustments, hazard detection, and automated safety responses if the system identifies a potential risk. Some demonstrations have even shown the scooter maneuvering on its own, driving onto a stage without a rider, and responding to remote commands through a smartphone app.

Another notable capability is automated parking. Instead of requiring riders to maneuver the bike into tight urban spaces manually, the OMO X can guide itself into a parking spot once a location is selected. The system relies on its self-balancing capability and onboard sensors to navigate safely, a feature that reflects the growing overlap between robotics and personal transportation.

The electric scooter’s futuristic design further reinforces its technological identity. Its sharp, angular styling and distinctive lighting signature give it a modern aesthetic that stands apart from traditional scooters. In a way, it carries the Tesla Cybertruck aesthetic, with a continuous front light bar replacing a conventional headlamp and creating a visually striking presence on the road.

Production plans for the OMO X are already underway. The company announced that the model has entered mass production following its global launch event in Singapore, with pre-orders expected to open in April 2026. Indonesia has been selected as the first launch market, where the electric scooter will debut commercially in Jakarta shortly afterward. Omoway is reportedly working with multiple regional distributors and plans to establish a dealer network of more than 100 locations in the country.

The post OMO X self-balancing electric scooter employs AI and Robotics to refresh urban riding experience first appeared on Yanko Design.

If not Palantir, why Palantir-shaped??

Palantir builds spy tech for the CIA, DHS, and ICE. It aggregates data, maps your life, and tells governments who to watch. Meta is building something with the same bones. It’s called Name Tag, a facial recognition feature coming to Ray-Ban smart glasses that lets a wearer look at a stranger in public and have an AI identify them in real time, pulling their name and profile directly from Facebook and Instagram. The surveillance hardware is a $300 fashion accessory, the database was built by 3 billion people tagging photos for free, and the targets are anyone, anywhere, who never agreed to any of it.

A leaked internal memo from May 2025, obtained by The New York Times, laid out the full scope: the feature is planned for every pair of Meta’s glasses, from Ray-Bans to the Oakley Meta HSTN sports line. Meta’s official response was a practiced non-denial: “we’re still thinking through options and will take a thoughtful approach if and before we roll anything out.” Companies that aren’t building something just say they’re not building it. Meta is not saying that.

The Database Was Being Built Before the Glasses Existed

Facebook turned on automatic photo tagging in 2010 with zero opt-in, and for eleven years, every time you tagged a friend’s face in a photo, you were feeding their facial recognition model. When Meta “deleted” over a billion faceprints in 2021 under lawsuit pressure, they kept the photos. They kept the social graph. They kept the engineers who built the whole thing. Name Tag isn’t a new product concept; it’s a previously mothballed capability getting a second run, this time with a camera on your face instead of a server in Menlo Park.

Anyone with a public Instagram account is immediately a potential target (it’s not like making your account private makes you any safer), which covers hundreds of millions of people who signed up to share photos, not to be enrolled in a real-world biometric identification system. Remember Portal, Meta’s smart home display with a face-tracking camera? It launched in 2018 right in the middle of the Cambridge Analytica fallout, and consumers collectively declined to put a Facebook camera in their living room. Meta discontinued it by 2022. The lesson they apparently took wasn’t “don’t build surveillance hardware.” It was “make sure the camera comes in wearing someone else’s face.”

They Know Exactly How We’ll React

“We will launch during a dynamic political environment where many civil society groups that we would expect to attack us would have their resources focused on other concerns.” That’s a sentence directly from an official internal planning document from Meta’s Reality Labs, dated May 2025, reviewed by The New York Times. The company was explicitly planning to exploit civic chaos as a launch window, timing the rollout of a mass surveillance feature to coincide with another crisis-event that occupies our mind so we’re distracted. Sleight of hand, with a dash of corporate evil. There’s no ethical framework in which that sentence represents good-faith product development.

Their original rollout plan was to debut Name Tag at a conference for the blind, wrapping a mass-surveillance tool in the language of accessibility before expanding it to the general public. That plan was eventually shelved, but the thinking behind it is the more revealing part. The accessibility framing was a softening mechanism, a way to generate human-interest coverage before the obvious misuse cases took over the conversation. Privacy advocates, abuse charities, and civil liberties groups were going to come for this feature regardless. The strategy was never to address their concerns. It was to buy a news cycle of goodwill first.

Your Face Is Being Reviewed in a Nairobi Office Park Right Now

Swedish newspapers Svenska Dagbladet and Göteborgs-Posten tracked Meta’s data pipeline from Ray-Ban glasses worn in Western homes to a company called Sama, operating out of an office park in Nairobi, Kenya. Workers there are paid to watch footage captured by glasses users and label what they see, teaching Meta’s AI to understand and interpret the visual world. The footage includes people on the toilet, naked bodies, couples in bed, bank card details accidentally filmed, and intimate conversations being had by people who had no idea they were being recorded, let alone reviewed by a contractor on another continent.

Meta’s defense was to point at a clause buried in their terms of service permitting “manual (human)” review of AI interactions, which is technically accurate and practically worthless as a justification, because no person buying a pair of fashion-forward smart glasses understands that clause to mean workers in Kenya are watching them undress. The April 2025 privacy policy update for the glasses silently expanded Meta’s right to use all captured photos, videos, and audio for AI training, with no prominent notification to existing owners. A class action lawsuit filed in San Francisco federal court in March 2026 argues this constitutes consumer fraud, given that Meta’s own marketing described the glasses as “designed for privacy, controlled by you.” The UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office wrote to Meta characterizing the situation as “concerning,” which in British regulatory language lands somewhere between “deeply troubled” and “genuinely alarmed.”

$2.1 Billion in Fines and Still Going

The fine history reads like a repeat offender’s rap sheet. Meta paid $650 million to settle an Illinois class action over collecting facial geometry without consent through Facebook’s “Tag Suggestion” feature. They paid another $68.5 million for the same BIPA violation in 2023. In 2024, Texas extracted $1.4 billion from them for capturing biometric data on millions of Texans “for commercial purposes” without informed consent, with the lawsuit specifically alleging Meta was disclosing that data for profit. That’s over $2.1 billion in biometric privacy penalties across four years, all for variations of the same violation, against the same company, building the same technology.

None of it changed the product roadmap. The Texas settlement of $1.4 billion represents roughly one percent of Meta’s $134 billion in 2023 revenue. The Electronic Privacy Information Center has filed complaints with the FTC calling Name Tag a direct facilitator of “stalking, harassment, doxxing and worse.” The EU’s AI Act classifies real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces as high-risk AI and prohibits it for most commercial applications. The fines and the regulatory pressure are clearly baked into Meta’s planning rather than functioning as deterrents. They paid $2.1 billion to establish what a decade of biometric data collection actually costs, looked at that number next to their revenue, and decided it wasn’t a fine. It was an investment.

The Glasses Are Just the Beginning

Name Tag as currently designed still requires the wearer to deliberately trigger an identification query. The next product removes even that minimal friction. Internal documents describe “super sensing” glasses with always-on cameras and microphones that record continuously for the entire duration they’re worn, feeding an unbroken stream to an AI assistant that builds a fully searchable log of the wearer’s day. The surveillance model shifts from opt-in query to permanent ambient default. Every person who passes within the glasses’ field of view gets their face processed, regardless of whether they’ve opted out, regardless of whether they even know the technology exists.

The threat model was demonstrated in 2024 by two Harvard students, AnhPhu Nguyen and Caine Ardayfio, using nothing but current, available hardware. They connected Ray-Ban Meta Gen 2 glasses to PimEyes, a commercial facial recognition engine, alongside LLM data extraction tools, FastPeopleSearch, and Cloaked.com for social security lookups. Streaming the feed to Instagram Live, they identified strangers on the Boston subway and pulled names, home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers in seconds. They approached a woman on the street, told her they’d met at a Cambridge Community Foundation event, and she believed them. They told a female student her Atlanta home address and her parents’ names; she confirmed they were right. Name Tag doesn’t make this possible. It already is possible. Name Tag just makes it Meta’s official product.

What “Opt-Out” Actually Means

Meta’s proposed safeguards rely on limiting identification to connected contacts or public accounts, and offering an opt-out toggle buried in Instagram settings. The connected-contacts restriction doesn’t address the most statistically common danger. Stalkers, abusers, and harassers overwhelmingly target people they already know. Limiting the feature to existing connections doesn’t reduce the risk to the most vulnerable users; it focuses it on them. Domestic abuse charities in the UK raised this point directly, noting that abusers could use Name Tag to locate survivors who have relocated, changed their appearance, or created entirely new digital identities to stay safe.

The opt-out toggle is available to Instagram’s roughly 2 billion monthly active users, almost none of whom will encounter it organically. Privacy protections that require the potential victim to proactively locate and activate a setting are not privacy protections. They are liability documentation. Abuse survivors, journalists, political dissidents, undocumented individuals, people in witness protection: these are the people with the highest stakes, and also the people with the least bandwidth to hunt through app settings on the off chance that facial recognition has been added to a device they don’t even own. The toggle protects Meta in a courtroom. It protects its users in no meaningful sense at all.

We Were Free Labor All Along

Twenty years of tagging photos, liking posts, following accounts, and uploading selfies. Every interaction trained the model. Every tagged face sharpened the database. Meta framed all of it as self-expression and social connection, and it was, but it was also free labor on the world’s largest biometric mapping project. The glasses are the hardware layer that connects that digital registry to the physical world. The data collection phase is largely complete. The deployment phase is now.

Reddit ran the same playbook with text and nobody stopped them either. In early 2024, Reddit signed a $60 million-per-year deal with Google to license user-generated content for AI training, then struck a separate deal with OpenAI estimated at $70 million annually. Two decades of forum posts, niche expertise, personal advice, and community-built knowledge that users created for each other got packaged and sold to the highest bidder. Users built the database. Reddit sold it. The users got nothing except the knowledge that their words now live inside a model they don’t control. Meta’s version is identical in structure and more intimate in substance, because the asset being extracted isn’t something you typed. It’s your face, your home, and the faces of everyone in your immediate vicinity.

While all of this unfolds on the hardware and data side, Meta is simultaneously stripping privacy from the software side. End-to-end encryption for Instagram DMs dies on May 8, 2026. Meta’s stated justification is that “very few people” were using it, which is a direct consequence of never making it the default and never promoting it. After May 8, Meta retains full technical access to message content, which means any contractor, government request, or legal process with sufficient leverage can access it too. The feature was specifically extended to users in Ukraine and Russia during the war as a safety measure for people in genuine danger. Those users are now being told to download their chats before the cutoff. The facial recognition is the front door. The unencrypted message access is the unlocked safe. At some point the question stops being “is Meta building a surveillance company?” and starts being “why are we still acting like it isn’t one?”

The post Meta Is Turning Its Smart Glasses Into A Mass Surveillance Tool… And You Can’t Stop It first appeared on Yanko Design.